PID-Inspired Inductive Biases for Deep Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Control Tasks
Ian Char, Jeff Schneider
Abstract
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has shown immense potential for learning to control systems through data alone. However, one challenge deep RL faces is that the full state of the system is often not observable. When this is the case, the policy needs to leverage the history of observations to infer the current state. At the same time, differences between the training and testing environments makes it critical for the policy not to overfit to the sequence of observations it sees at training time. As such, there is an important balancing act between having the history encoder be flexible enough to extract relevant information, yet be robust to changes in the environment. To strike this balance, we look to the PID controller for inspiration. We assert the PID controller's success shows that only summing and differencing are needed to accumulate information over time for many control tasks. Following this principle, we propose two architectures for encoding history: one that directly uses PID features and another that extends these core ideas and can be used in arbitrary control tasks. When compared with prior approaches, our encoders produce policies that are often more robust and achieve better performance on a variety of tracking tasks. Going beyond tracking tasks, our policies achieve 1.7x better performance on average over previous state-of-the-art methods on a suite of locomotion control tasks. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 52224e0a-6741-42eb-a3f7-78bfb2a47453Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- Stabilizing Transformers for Reinforcement LearningEmilio Parisotto, H. Francis Song, Jack W. Rae, Razvan Pascanu et al.ICML 2020 · 464 citations
- Recurrent Model-Free RL Can Be a Strong Baseline for Many POMDPsTianwei Ni, Benjamin Eysenbach, Ruslan SalakhutdinovICML 2022 · 162 citations
- Variational Recurrent Models for Solving Partially Observable Control TasksDongqi Han, Kenji Doya, Jun TaniICLR 2020 · 75 citations
- Transformers are Meta-Reinforcement LearnersLuckeciano C. MeloICML 2022 · 66 citations
- Monotonic Robust Policy Optimization with Model DiscrepancyYuankun Jiang, Chenglin Li, Wenrui Dai, Junni Zou et al.ICML 2021 · 24 citations
Related papers
- Globally Optimal Policy Gradient Algorithms for Reinforcement Learning with PID Control PoliciesVipul Sharma, Wesley Suttle, S. SivaranjaniNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Decoupling Value and Policy for Generalization in Reinforcement LearningRoberta Raileanu, Rob FergusICML 2021 · 116 citations
- Learning Belief Representations for Partially Observable Deep RLAndrew Wang, Andrew C. Li, Toryn Q. Klassen, Rodrigo Toro Icarte et al.ICML 2023 · 21 citations
- Cross-Trajectory Representation Learning for Zero-Shot Generalization in RLBogdan Mazoure, Ahmed M. Ahmed, R. Devon Hjelm, Andrey Kolobov et al.ICLR 2022 · 30 citations
- Neural Dynamic Policies for End-to-End Sensorimotor LearningShikhar Bahl, Mustafa Mukadam, Abhinav Gupta, Deepak PathakNeurIPS 2020 · 97 citations
