LinEAS: End-to-end Learning of Activation Steering with a Distributional Loss
Pau Rodríguez, Michal Klein, Eleonora Gualdoni, Valentino Maiorca, Arno Blaas, Luca Zappella, Marco Cuturi, Xavier Suau
Abstract
The growing use of generative models in daily life calls for efficient mechanisms to control their generation, to e.g., produce safe content or provide users with tools to explore style changes. Ideally, such mechanisms should require low volume of unpaired data (i.e., without explicit preference), and should be cheap, both at train and inference time, while preserving output quality. Recent research has shown that such mechanisms can be obtained by intervening exclusively on model activations, with the goal of correcting distributional differences between activations seen when using prompts from a source vs. a target set (e.g., toxic and non-toxic sentences). While cheap, these fast methods are inherently crude: their maps are tuned locally, not accounting for their impact on downstream layers, resulting in interventions that cause unintended shifts when used out-of-sample. We propose in this work linear end-to-end activation steering (LinEAS), an approach trained with a global loss that accounts simultaneously for all layer-wise distributional shifts. In addition to being more robust, the loss used to train LinEAS can be regularized with sparsifying norms, which can automatically carry out neuron selection. LinEAS only requires a handful of unpaired samples to be effective, and beats similar baselines on toxicity mitigation in language models, becoming competitive with oracle-dependent methods that have access to strong supervision. LinEAS is modality-agnostic and we empirically find that it outperforms existing activation steering methods at mitigating and including new concepts at the output of single-step text-to-image generation models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on20
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image SynthesisDustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann et al.ICLR 2024 · 4,569 citations
Related papers
- Breaking Bad Tokens: Detoxification of LLMs Using Sparse AutoencodersAgam Goyal, Vedant Rathi, William Yeh, Yian Wang et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Redefining Experts: Interpretable Decomposition of Language Models for Toxicity MitigationZuhair Hasan Shaik, Abdullah Mazhar, Aseem Srivastava, Md. Shad AkhtarNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Controlling Language and Diffusion Models by Transporting ActivationsPau Rodríguez, Arno Blaas, Michal Klein, Luca Zappella et al.ICLR 2025
- Local Linearity of LLMs Enables Activation Steering via Model-Based Linear Optimal ControlJulian Skifstad, Xinyue Annie Yang, Glen ChouICML 2026 · 2 citations
- A Geometric Information Bottleneck for Activation SteeringToan Doan, Thin Nguyen, Sunil GuptaKDD 2026
