USENIX Security2023Top-tier venue
Educators' Perspectives of Using (or Not Using) Online Exam Proctoring
David G. Balash, Elena Korkes, Miles Grant, Adam J. Aviv, Rahel A. Fainchtein, Micah Sherr
Abstract
The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic changed the landscape of education and led to increased usage of remote proctoring tools that are designed to monitor students when they take assessments outside the classroom. While prior work has explored students' privacy and security concerns regarding online proctoring tools, the perspective of educators is under explored. Notably, educators are the decision makers in the classrooms and choose which remote proctoring services and the level of observations they deem appropriate. To explore how educators balance the security and privacy of their students with the requirements of remote exams, we sent survey requests to over 3,400 instructors at a large private university that taught online classes during the 2020/21 academic year. We had n=125 responses: 21% of the educators surveyed used online exam proctoring services during the remote learning period, and of those, 35% plan to continue using the tools even when there is a full return to in-person learning. Educators who use exam proctoring services are often comfortable with their monitoring capabilities. However, educators are concerned about students sharing certain types of information with exam proctoring companies, particularly when proctoring services collect identifiable information to validate students' identities. Our results suggest that many educators developed alternative assessments that did not require online proctoring and that those who did use online proctoring services often considered the tradeoffs between the potential risks to student privacy and the utility or necessity of exam proctoring services.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 51ff56d0-805f-4abe-96b9-ce986a935b2eCited by top-tier papers3
- Trust, Because You Can't Verify: Privacy and Security Hurdles in Education Technology Acquisition PracticesEaston Kelso, Ananta Soneji, Sazzadur Rahaman, Yan Shoshitaishvili et al.CCS 2024 · 5 citations
- "Modern problems require modern solutions": Community-Developed Techniques for Online Exam Proctoring EvasionLucy Simko, Adryana Hutchinson, Alvin Isaac, Evan Fries et al.CCS 2024 · 4 citations
- "It's been Lovely Watching you": Institutional Decision-Making on Online Proctoring SoftwareElisa Shioji, Ani Meliksetyan, Lucy Simko, Ryan Watkins et al.S&P 2025
Builds on1
Related papers
- Re-Examining the Examiners: Changes in Privacy and Security Perceptions of Exam ProctoringAdryana Hutchinson, Elaine Ly, Collins W. Munyendo, Adam J. AvivCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Online Proctoring: Privacy Invasion or Study Alleviation?: Discovering Acceptability Using Contextual IntegrityArnout Terpstra, Alwin de Rooij, Alexander P. SchoutenCHI 2023 · 26 citations
- A Visual Analytics Approach to Facilitate the Proctoring of Online ExamsHaotian Li, Min Xu, Yong Wang, Huan Wei et al.CHI 2021 · 71 citations
- Cybersecurity, Safety, & Privacy Concerns of Student Support Structure for Information and Communication Technologies in Online EducationFaiza Tazi, Sunny Shrestha, Sanchari DasCSCW 2023 · 12 citations
- What Do You Get from Turning on Your Video? Effects of Videoconferencing Affordances on Remote Class Experience During COVID-19Yanting Wu, Yuan Sun, S. Shyam SundarCSCW 2022 · 11 citations
