Lune

SIGIR2026Top-tier venue

Multi-Sourced, Multi-Agent Evidence Retrieval for Fact-Checking

Shuzhi Gong, Richard O. Sinnott, Jianzhong Qi, Cécile Paris, Preslav Nakov, Zhuohan Xie

2026Year
2Citations

Abstract

Misinformation spreading over the Internet poses a significant threat to both societies and individuals, necessitating robust and scalable fact-checking that relies on retrieving accurate and trustworthy evidence. Previous methods rely on semantic and socialcontextual patterns learned from training data, which limits their generalization to new data distributions. Recently, Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) based methods have been proposed to utilize the reasoning capability of LLMs with retrieved grounding evidence documents. However, these methods largely rely on textual similarity for evidence retrieval and struggle to retrieve evidence that captures multi-hop semantic relations within rich document contents. These limitations lead to overlooking subtle factual correlations between the evidence and the claims to be factchecked during evidence retrieval, thus causing inaccurate veracity predictions.

To address these issues, we propose a Web-enhanced Knowledge Graph retrieval Fact-Checking agentic framework (WKGFC), which exploits authorized open knowledge graph as a core resource of evidence. LLM-enabled retrieval is designed to assess the claims and retrieve the most relevant knowledge subgraphs, forming structured evidence for fact verification. To augment the knowledge graph evidence, we retrieve web contents for completion. The above process is implemented as an automatic Markov Decision Process (MDP): A reasoning LLM agent decides what actions to take according to the current evidence and the claims. To adapt the MDP for fact-checking, we use prompt optimization to fine-tune the agentic LLM. Our extensive experiments over datasets in three categories (Wikipedia, websites, and article summaries) show that WKGFC outperform several advanced state-of-the-art fact-checking methods in balanced accuracy score by over 5% absolute. These results highlight the effectiveness of knowledge-centric evidence retrieval for fact-checking under open-world settings.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 51afad5f-cf0b-4906-9d56-d2efa0792e1f

Builds on21

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines