Q-Sched: Pushing the Boundaries of Few-Step Diffusion Models with Quantization-Aware Scheduling
Natalia Frumkin, Diana Marculescu
Abstract
Text-to-image diffusion models remain computationally intensive: generating a single image typically requires dozens of passes through large transformer backbones (e.g., SDXL uses 50 evaluations of a 2.6B-parameter model). Few-step variants reduce the step count to 2–8 but still rely on large, full-precision backbones, making inference impractical on resource-constrained platforms. Existing post-training quantization (PTQ) methods are further hampered by their dependence on full-precision calibration. We introduce Q-Sched , a scheduler-level PTQ approach that adapts the diffusion sampler while keeping the quantized weights fixed. By adjusting the few-step sampling trajectory with quantization-aware preconditioning coefficients, Q-Sched matches or surpasses full-precision quality while delivering a 4× reduction in model size and preserving a single reusable checkpoint across bit-widths. To learn these coefficients, we propose a reference-free Joint Alignment–Quality (JAQ) loss, which combines text–image compatibility with an image-quality objective for fine-grained control. JAQ requires only a handful of calibration prompts and avoids any full-precision inference during calibration. Empirically, Q-Sched yields substantial gains: a 15.5% FID improvement over the FP16 4-step Latent Consistency Model and a 16.6% improvement over the FP16 8-step Phased Consistency Model, demonstrating that quantization and few-step distillation are complementary for high-fidelity generation. A large-scale user study with 80,000+ annotations further validates these results on both FLUX.1[schnell] and SDXL-Turbo. Code: https://github.com/enyac-group/q-sched
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on27
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Implicit ModelsJiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, Stefano ErmonICLR 2021 · 11,743 citations
- Scalable Diffusion Models with TransformersWilliam Peebles, Saining XieICCV 2023 · 5,568 citations
- SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image SynthesisDustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann et al.ICLR 2024 · 4,569 citations
Related papers
- Absorbing Quantization Error by Deformable Noise Scheduler for Diffusion ModelsMingrui Yang, Wei Huang, Hao Nan SHENG, Donglin Yang et al.ICML 2026
- Q-Diffusion: Quantizing Diffusion ModelsXiuyu Li, Yijiang Liu, Long Lian, Huanrui Yang et al.ICCV 2023 · 279 citations
- PTQD: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Diffusion ModelsYefei He, Luping Liu, Jing Liu, Weijia Wu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 219 citations
- Designing Instance-Level Sampling Schedules via REINFORCE with James-Stein ShrinkagePeiyu Yu, Suraj Kothawade, Sirui Xie, Ying Nian Wu et al.CVPR 2026 · 1 citation
- Shortcutting Pre-trained Flow Matching Diffusion Models is Almost Free LunchXu Cai, Yang Wu, Qianli Chen, Haoran Wu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
