D: Dynamic Directional Graph-Constrained Data Scheduling for LLM Training
Yuanjian Xu, Jianing Hao, Guang Zhang, Zhong Li
Abstract
Training data plays a central role in large language models (LLMs) optimization, motivating extensive research on data scheduling strategies. Most existing approaches concentrate on adjusting the overall data distribution but neglect the underlying interactions between samples during training. However, we argue that such interactions cannot be overlooked, as real-world data samples frequently exhibit directional influences on each other, making the training order crucial. Intuitively, we can prioritize train-units with greater influence to improves learning efficiency. In this work, we propose , a Dynamic, Directional graph-constrained Data scheduling framework. formulates the complex interactions among train-units as a dynamic influence graph, where edges represent loss-based dependencies. It then solves a constrained optimization problem over this graph to derive the training order, which ensures that the data sequence respects the evolving information flow throughout training. Our approach is theoretically motivated and yields consistent improvements over existing data scheduling methods across both pre-training and post-training phases. Furthermore, for scalability, also employs an efficient approximation algorithm that keeps the additional computational overhead within a manageable range. For future research, the code is available at https://github.com/xuyj233/D3.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5129e7c9-ac6c-4973-ad35-4a38e0c672ffBuilds on22
- PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural LanguageYonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Ronan Le Bras, Jianfeng Gao et al.AAAI 2020 · 2,916 citations
- Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningBen Sorscher, Robert Geirhos, Shashank Shekhar, Surya Ganguli et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 720 citations
- Scaling Data-Constrained Language ModelsNiklas Muennighoff, Alexander M. Rush, Boaz Barak, Teven Le Scao et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 475 citations
- Data Selection for Language Models via Importance ResamplingSang Michael Xie, Shibani Santurkar, Tengyu Ma, Percy LiangNeurIPS 2023 · 383 citations
- A Diffusion Theory For Deep Learning Dynamics: Stochastic Gradient Descent Exponentially Favors Flat MinimaZeke Xie, Issei Sato, Masashi SugiyamaICLR 2021 · 165 citations
Related papers
- Demystifying Data Organization for Enhanced LLM TrainingYalun Dai, Yangyu Huang, Tongshen Yang, Yonghan Wang et al.ACL 2026
- LLM Data Selection and Utilization via Dynamic Bi-level OptimizationYang Yu, Kai Han, Hang Zhou, Yehui Tang et al.ICML 2025
- Adaptive Batch-Wise Sample Scheduling for Direct Preference OptimizationZixuan Huang, Yikun Ban, Lean Fu, Xiaojie Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- Distribution-Value Coevolution for Adaptive RLHF Data SchedulingZairun Yang, Yanbo Yang, Chenyi Zhou, Xinyu Guan et al.KDD 2026
- Dynamic Loss-Based Sample Reweighting for Improved Large Language Model PretrainingDaouda Sow, Herbert Woisetschläger, Saikiran Bulusu, Shiqiang Wang et al.ICLR 2025
