Counting and Reasoning with Plans
David Speck, Markus Hecher, Daniel Gnad, Johannes Klaus Fichte, Augusto B. Corrêa
Abstract
Classical planning asks for a sequence of operators reaching a given goal. While the most common case is to compute a plan, many scenarios require more than that. However, quantitative reasoning on the plan space remains mostly unexplored. A fundamental problem is to count plans, which relates to the conditional probability on the plan space. Indeed, qualitative and quantitative approaches are well-established in various other areas of automated reasoning.
We present the first study to quantitative and qualitative reasoning on the plan space. In particular, we focus on polynomially bounded plans. On the theoretical side, we study its complexity, which gives rise to rich reasoning modes. Since counting is hard in general, we introduce the easier notion of facets, which enables understanding the significance of operators. On the practical side, we implement quantitative reasoning for planning. Thereby, we transform a planning task into a propositional formula and use knowledge compilation to count different plans. This framework scales well to large plan spaces, while enabling rich reasoning capabilities such as learning pruning functions and explainable planning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 510f72f1-2d1d-465b-8deb-e7d35c4d88f9Builds on9
- Symbolic Top-k PlanningDavid Speck, Robert Mattmüller, Bernhard NebelAAAI 2020 · 61 citations
- Reshaping Diverse PlanningMichael Katz, Shirin SohrabiAAAI 2020 · 55 citations
- A New Approach to Plan-Space Explanation: Analyzing Plan-Property Dependencies in Oversubscription PlanningRebecca Eifler, Michael Cashmore, Jörg Hoffmann, Daniele Magazzeni et al.AAAI 2020 · 54 citations
- Learning Domain-Independent Heuristics for Grounded and Lifted PlanningDillon Ze Chen, Sylvie Thiébaux, Felipe W. TrevizanAAAI 2024 · 29 citations
- Towards Automated Modeling Assistance: An Efficient Approach for Repairing Flawed Planning DomainsSongtuan Lin, Alban Grastien, Pascal BercherAAAI 2023 · 24 citations
Related papers
- Learning Planning Domains from Non-redundant Fully-Observed Traces: Theoretical Foundations and Complexity AnalysisPascal Bachor, Gregor BehnkeAAAI 2024 · 5 citations
- Computing Plan-Length Bounds Using Lengths of Longest PathsMohammad Abdulaziz, Dominik BergerAAAI 2021 · 4 citations
- Structurally Restricted Fragments of Numeric Planning - a Complexity AnalysisAlexander Shleyfman, Daniel Gnad, Peter JonssonAAAI 2023 · 4 citations
- Towards Practical Classical Planning Compilations of Numeric PlanningLuigi Bonassi, Francesco Percassi, Enrico ScalaAAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- An Effective Polynomial Technique for Compiling Conditional Effects AwayAlfonso Emilio Gerevini, Francesco Percassi, Enrico ScalaAAAI 2024 · 5 citations
