Debiasing Diffusion Priors via 3D Attention for Consistent Gaussian Splatting
Shilong Jin, Haoran Duan, Litao Hua, Wentao Huang, Yuan Zhou
Abstract
Versatile 3D tasks (e.g., generation or editing) distilling Text-to-Image (T2I) diffusion models have attracted significant research interest for not relying on extensive 3D training data. However, T2I models exhibit limitations resulting from prior view bias, which produces conflicting appearances between different views of an object. This bias causes subject-words to preferentially activate prior view features during cross-attention (CA) computation, regardless of the target view condition. To overcome this limitation, we conduct a comprehensive mathematical analysis to reveal the root cause of the prior view bias in T2I models. Moreover, we find different UNet-Layers show different effects of prior view in CA. Therefore, we propose a novel framework, TD-Attn, which addresses multi-view inconsistency via two key components: (1) the 3D-Aware Attention Guidance Module 3D-AAG constructs a view-consistent 3D attention Gaussian for subject-words to enforce spatial consistency across attention-focused regions, thereby compensating for the limited spatial information in 2D individual view CA maps; (2) the Hierarchical Attention Modulation Module (HAM) utilizes a semantic guidance tree to direct the Semantic Response Profiler (SRP) in localizing and modulating CA layers that are highly responsive to view conditions, where the enhanced CA maps further support the construction of more consistent 3D attention Gaussians. Notably, HAM facilitates semantic-specific interventions, enabling controllable and precise 3D editing. Extensive experiments firmly establish that TD-Attn has the potential to serve as a transformative, universal plugin, significantly enhancing multi-view consistency across a wide range of 3D tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on25
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- 3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field RenderingBernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimkühler, George DrettakisSIGGRAPH 2023 · 5,687 citations
- Zero-1-to-3: Zero-shot One Image to 3D ObjectRuoshi Liu, Rundi Wu, Basile Van Hoorick, Pavel Tokmakov et al.ICCV 2023 · 1,662 citations
- ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image GenerationJiazheng Xu, Xiao Liu, Yuchen Wu, Yuxuan Tong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,310 citations
Related papers
- GenesisTex2: Stable, Consistent and High-Quality Text-to-Texture GenerationJiawei Lu, Yingpeng Zhang, Zengjun Zhao, He Wang et al.AAAI 2025 · 10 citations
- DiGA3D: Coarse-to-Fine Diffusional Propagation of Geometry and Appearance for Versatile 3D InpaintingJingyi Pan, Dan Xu, Qiong LuoICCV 2025 · 3 citations
- InterGSEdit: Interactive 3D Gaussian Splatting Editing with 3D Geometry-Consistent Attention PriorMinghao Wen, Shengjie Wu, Kangkan Wang, Dong LiangICCV 2025 · 5 citations
- InstructMix2Mix: Consistent Sparse-View Editing Through Multi-View Model PersonalizationDaniel Gilo, Or LitanyCVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- FLATTEN: optical FLow-guided ATTENtion for consistent text-to-video editingYuren Cong, Mengmeng Xu, Christian Simon, Shoufa Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 175 citations
