On The Fragility of Benchmark Contamination Detection in Reasoning Models
Han Wang, Haoyu Li, Brian Ko, Huan Zhang
Abstract
Leaderboards for large reasoning models (LRMs) have turned evaluation into a competition, incentivizing developers to optimize directly on benchmark suites. A shortcut to achieving higher rankings is to incorporate evaluation benchmarks into the training data, thereby yielding inflated performance, known as benchmark contamination. Despite that numerous contamination detection approaches have been proposed, surprisingly, our studies find that evading contamination detections for LRMs is alarmingly easy. We focus on the two scenarios where contamination may occur in practice: (I) when the base model evolves into LRM via supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL), we find that contamination during SFT can be originally identified by contamination detection methods. Yet, even a brief Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) training can markedly conceal contamination signals that most detection methods rely on. Further empirical experiments and theoretical analysis indicate that Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) style importance sampling and clipping objectives are the root cause of this detection concealment, indicating that a broad class of RL methods may inherently exhibit similar concealment capability; (II) when SFT contamination with CoT is applied to advanced LRMs as the final stage, most contamination detection methods perform near random guesses. Without exposure to non-members, contaminated LRMs would still have more confidence when responding to those unseen samples that share similar distributions to the training set, and thus, evade existing memorization-based detection methods. Together, our findings reveal the unique vulnerability of LRMs evaluations: Model developers could easily contaminate LRMs to achieve inflated leaderboards performance while leaving minimal traces of contamination, thereby strongly undermining the fairness of evaluation and threatening the integrity of public leaderboards. This underscores the urgent need for advanced contamination detection methods and trustworthy evaluation protocols tailored to LRMs. Our code is available at https://github.com/ASTRAL-Group/ LRM_Conta_Detection_Arena.git .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 50abf778-eef6-483d-b39d-e8754560e302Builds on18
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
- DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 citations
- FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work PartitioningTri DaoICLR 2024 · 2,600 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
- Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentionWoosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng et al.SOSP 2023 · 1,016 citations
Related papers
- Detecting Data Contamination from Reinforcement Learning Post-training for Large Language ModelsYongding Tao, Tian Wang, Yihong Dong, Huanyu Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- ConStat: Performance-Based Contamination Detection in Large Language ModelsJasper Dekoninck, Mark Niklas Müller, Martin T. VechevNeurIPS 2024 · 40 citations
- AAPO: Enhancing the Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs with Advantage MarginJian Xiong, Jingbo Zhou, Jingyong Ye, Qiang Huang et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- To the Cutoff... and Beyond? A Longitudinal Perspective on LLM Data ContaminationManley Roberts, Himanshu Thakur, Christine Herlihy, Colin White et al.ICLR 2024 · 45 citations
- LLMEval-Fair: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study on Robust and Fair Evaluation of Large Language ModelsMing Zhang, Yujiong Shen, Jingyi Deng, Yuhui Wang et al.ACL 2026
