AutoQA: From Databases To QA Semantic Parsers With Only Synthetic Training Data
Silei Xu, Sina J. Semnani, Giovanni Campagna, Monica S. Lam
Abstract
We propose AutoQA, a methodology and toolkit to generate semantic parsers that answer questions on databases, with no manual effort. Given a database schema and its data, AutoQA automatically generates a large set of high-quality questions for training that covers different database operations. It uses automatic paraphrasing combined with templatebased parsing to find alternative expressions of an attribute in different parts of speech. It also uses a novel filtered auto-paraphraser to generate correct paraphrases of entire sentences. We apply AutoQA to the Schema2QA dataset and obtain an average logical form accuracy of 62.9% when tested on natural questions, which is only 6.4% lower than a model trained with expert natural language annotations and paraphrase data collected from crowdworkers. To demonstrate the generality of AutoQA, we also apply it to the Overnight dataset. AutoQA achieves 69.8% answer accuracy, 16.4% higher than the state-of-the-art zero-shot models and only 5.2% lower than the same model trained with human data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 507d69dd-36e3-47ee-a269-a5239eadb71bCited by top-tier papers15
- Constrained Language Models Yield Few-Shot Semantic ParsersRichard Shin, Christopher H. Lin, Sam Thomson, Charles Chen et al.EMNLP 2021 · 131 citations
- GraphQ IR: Unifying the Semantic Parsing of Graph Query Languages with One Intermediate RepresentationLunyiu Nie, Shulin Cao, Jiaxin Shi, Jiuding Sun et al.EMNLP 2022 · 20 citations
- GPTVoiceTasker: Advancing Multi-step Mobile Task Efficiency Through Dynamic Interface Exploration and LearningMinh Duc Vu, Han Wang, Jieshan Chen, Zhuang Li et al.UIST 2024 · 17 citations
- On The Ingredients of an Effective Zero-shot Semantic ParserPengcheng Yin, John Wieting, Avirup Sil, Graham NeubigACL 2022 · 15 citations
- Voicify Your UI: Towards Android App Control with Voice CommandsMinh Duc Vu, Han Wang, Zhuang Li, Gholamreza Haffari et al.UbiComp 2023 · 13 citations
Builds on9
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Towards Scalable Multi-Domain Conversational Agents: The Schema-Guided Dialogue DatasetAbhinav Rastogi, Xiaoxue Zang, Srinivas Sunkara, Raghav Gupta et al.AAAI 2020 · 707 citations
- Do Not Have Enough Data? Deep Learning to the Rescue!Ateret Anaby-Tavor, Boaz Carmeli, Esther Goldbraich, Amir Kantor et al.AAAI 2020 · 398 citations
- Revisiting Self-Training for Neural Sequence GenerationJunxian He, Jiatao Gu, Jiajun Shen, Marc'Aurelio RanzatoICLR 2020 · 294 citations
Related papers
- Uni-Parser: Unified Semantic Parser for Question Answering on Knowledge Base and DatabaseYe Liu, Semih Yavuz, Rui Meng, Dragomir Radev et al.EMNLP 2022 · 21 citations
- KaggleDBQA: Realistic Evaluation of Text-to-SQL ParsersChia-Hsuan Lee, Oleksandr Polozov, Matthew RichardsonACL 2021
- Grounded Adaptation for Zero-shot Executable Semantic ParsingVictor Zhong, Mike Lewis, Sida I. Wang, Luke ZettlemoyerEMNLP 2020 · 85 citations
- Finding needles in a haystack: Sampling Structurally-diverse Training Sets from Synthetic Data for Compositional GeneralizationInbar Oren, Jonathan Herzig, Jonathan BerantEMNLP 2021
- Diverse Parallel Data Synthesis for Cross-Database Adaptation of Text-to-SQL ParsersAbhijeet Awasthi, Ashutosh Sathe, Sunita SarawagiEMNLP 2022 · 7 citations
