Last Switch Dependent Bandits with Monotone Payoff Functions
Ayoub Foussoul, Vineet Goyal, Orestis Papadigenopoulos, Assaf Zeevi
Abstract
In a recent work, Laforgue et al. introduce the model of last switch dependent (LSD) bandits, in an attempt to capture nonstationary phenomena induced by the interaction between the player and the environment. Examples include satiation, where consecutive plays of the same action lead to decreased performance, or deprivation, where the payoff of an action increases after an interval of inactivity. In this work, we take a step towards understanding the approximability of planning LSD bandits, namely, the (NP-hard) problem of computing an optimal arm-pulling strategy under complete knowledge of the model. In particular, we design the first efficient constant approximation algorithm for the problem and show that, under a natural monotonicity assumption on the payoffs, its approximation guarantee (almost) matches the state-of-the-art for the special and well-studied class of recharging bandits (also known as delay-dependent). In this attempt, we develop new tools and insights for this class of problems, including a novel higher-dimensional relaxation and the technique of mirroring the evolution of virtual states. We believe that these novel elements could potentially be used for approaching richer classes of action-induced nonstationary bandits (e.g., special instances of restless bandits). In the case where the model parameters are initially unknown, we develop an online learning adaptation of our algorithm for which we provide sublinear regret guarantees against its full-information counterpart.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 502b042e-3efe-4907-b37c-845115ee17feCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- Adversarial Blocking BanditsNick Bishop, Hau Chan, Debmalya Mandal, Long Tran-ThanhNeurIPS 2020 · 15 citations
- Recurrent Submodular Welfare and Matroid Blocking Semi-BanditsOrestis Papadigenopoulos, Constantine CaramanisNeurIPS 2021 · 10 citations
- Non-Stationary Bandits under Recharging Payoffs: Improved Planning with Sublinear RegretOrestis Papadigenopoulos, Constantine Caramanis, Sanjay ShakkottaiNeurIPS 2022 · 7 citations
- Dynamic Planning and Learning under Recovering RewardsDavid Simchi-Levi, Zeyu Zheng, Feng ZhuICML 2021 · 6 citations
- Stochastic Rising BanditsAlberto Maria Metelli, Francesco Trovò, Matteo Pirola, Marcello RestelliICML 2022 · 1 citation
Related papers
- Rebounding Bandits for Modeling Satiation EffectsLiu Leqi, Fatma Kilinç-Karzan, Zachary C. Lipton, Alan L. MontgomeryNeurIPS 2021 · 30 citations
- Graph-Triggered Rising BanditsGianmarco Genalti, Marco Mussi, Nicola Gatti, Marcello Restelli et al.ICML 2024 · 6 citations
- Stochastic Bandits with Graph Feedback in Non-Stationary EnvironmentsShiyin Lu, Yao Hu, Lijun ZhangAAAI 2021 · 10 citations
- Combinatorial Blocking Bandits with Stochastic DelaysAlexia Atsidakou, Orestis Papadigenopoulos, Soumya Basu, Constantine Caramanis et al.ICML 2021 · 10 citations
- Non-monotonic Resource Utilization in the Bandits with Knapsacks ProblemRaunak Kumar, Robert KleinbergNeurIPS 2022 · 17 citations
