Is the Hard-Label Cryptanalytic Model Extraction Really Polynomial?
Akira Ito, Takayuki Miura, Yosuke Todo
Abstract
Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have attracted significant attention, and their internal models are regarded as valuable intellectual assets. Extracting a model via oracle access to a DNN is conceptually similar to extracting a secret key via oracle access to a block cipher. Consequently, cryptanalytic techniques, particularly differential-like attacks, have been actively explored recently. ReLU-based DNNs are the most common architectures. While early works (e.g., Crypto 2020, Eurocrypt 2024) assume access to exact output logits, more recent works (e.g., Asiacrypt 2024, Eurocrypt 2025) focus on the hard-label setting, where the attacker observes only the final classification result (e.g., "dog" or "car"). Notably, Carlini et al. (Eurocrypt 2025) demonstrated that model extraction is feasible in polynomial time even under this restricted setting. In this paper, we show that a key assumption of their attack becomes increasingly unrealistic as the target depth grows. While prior works have noted neurons whose activation states rarely change, we analyze their concrete impact on hard-label extraction: even a single neuron that is (almost) always active can prevent the attack from proceeding unless its parameters are recovered, and ignoring it inevitably incurs a non-negligible error. A straightforward solution is to recover these parameters from a state switch, but observing such a switch becomes exponentially harder as the depth increases, implying that hard-label extraction is not always polynomial time. To address this limitation, we propose cross-layer extraction. Rather than extracting the secret parameters (e.g., weights and biases) directly, we exploit cross-layer interactions to recover them from deeper layers, reducing query complexity and addressing limitations of existing model extraction approaches. The source code is available at https://github.com/ECSIS-lab/hard-label-cross-layer-extraction.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 500c1536-8b6e-49cf-bb66-695ea92fd394Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIsFlorian Tramèr, Fan Zhang, Ari Juels, Michael K. Reiter et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 2,088 citations
- Reverse-engineering deep ReLU networksDavid Rolnick, Konrad P. KordingICML 2020 · 121 citations
- Cryptanalytic Extraction of Neural Network ModelsNicholas Carlini, Matthew Jagielski, Ilya MironovCRYPTO 2020 · 109 citations
- Beyond Slow Signs in High-fidelity Model ExtractionHanna Foerster, Robert Mullins, Ilia Shumailov, Jamie HayesNeurIPS 2024 · 19 citations
Related papers
- Polynomial Time Cryptanalytic Extraction of Deep Neural Networks in the Hard-Label SettingNicholas Carlini, Jorge Chávez-Saab, Anna Hambitzer, Francisco Rodríguez-Henríquez et al.EUROCRYPT 2025 · 10 citations
- Polynomial Time Cryptanalytic Extraction of Neural Network ModelsIsaac Andrés Canales Martinez, Jorge Chávez-Saab, Anna Hambitzer, Francisco Rodríguez-Henríquez et al.EUROCRYPT 2024 · 13 citations
- Navigating the Deep: End-to-End Extraction on Deep Neural NetworksHaolin Liu, Adrien Siproudhis, Samuel Experton, Peter Lorenz et al.EUROCRYPT 2026 · 2 citations
- An Exact Poly-Time Membership-Queries Algorithm for Extracting a Three-Layer ReLU NetworkAmit Daniely, Elad GranotICLR 2023
- Cryptanalytic Extraction of Deep Neural Networks with Non-linear ActivationsRoderick Asselineau, Patrick Derbez, Pierre-Alain Fouque, Brice MinaudCRYPTO 2026 · 8 citations
