EMNLP Findings2024
Machine Translation Hallucination Detection for Low and High Resource Languages using Large Language Models
Kenza Benkirane, Laura Gongas, Shahar Pelles, Naomi Fuchs, Joshua Darmon, Pontus Stenetorp, David Ifeoluwa Adelani, Eduardo Sánchez
Abstract
Recent advancements in massively multilingual machine translation systems have significantly enhanced translation accuracy; however, even the best performing systems still generate hallucinations, severely impacting user trust. Detecting hallucinations in Machine Translation (MT) remains a critical challenge, particularly since existing methods excel with High-Resource Languages (HRLs) but exhibit substantial limitations when applied to Low-Resource Languages (LRLs). This paper evaluates sentencelevel hallucination detection approaches using Large Language Models (LLMs) and semantic similarity within massively multilingual embeddings. Our study spans 16 language directions, covering HRLs, LRLs, with diverse scripts. We find that the choice of model is essential for performance. On average, for HRLs, Llama3-70B outperforms the previous state of the art by as much as 0.16 MCC (Matthews Correlation Coefficient). However, for LRLs we observe that Claude Sonnet outperforms other LLMs on average by 0.03 MCC. The key takeaway from our study is that LLMs can achieve performance comparable or even better than previously proposed models, despite not being explicitly trained for any machine translation task. However, their advantage is less significant for LRLs. 1
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 3 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- HAT: Hallucination Annotation for TranslationRajen Chatterjee, Xintong Li, Paisarn Charoenpornsawat, Allen LeeACL 2026
- Toward Robust Evaluation for Multilingual Grammatical Error Correction: Can Large Language Models Replace Human References?Alla Rozovskaya, Dan RothACL 2026
- CCHall: A Novel Benchmark for Joint Cross-Lingual and Cross-Modal Hallucinations Detection in Large Language ModelsYongheng Zhang, Xu Liu, Ruoxi Zhou, Qiguang Chen et al.ACL 2025
Builds on9
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Bitext Mining Using Distilled Sentence Representations for Low-Resource LanguagesKevin Heffernan, Onur Çelebi, Holger SchwenkEMNLP Findings 2022 · 47 citations
- Unsupervised Real-Time Hallucination Detection based on the Internal States of Large Language ModelsWeihang Su, Changyue Wang, Qingyao Ai, Yiran Hu et al.ACL Findings 2024 · 47 citations
- INSTRUCTSCORE: Towards Explainable Text Generation Evaluation with Automatic FeedbackWenda Xu, Danqing Wang, Liangming Pan, Zhenqiao Song et al.EMNLP 2023 · 36 citations
- Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Machine Translation: Model Internal Workings Alone Do Well, Sentence Similarity Even BetterDavid Dale, Elena Voita, Loïc Barrault, Marta R. Costa-jussàACL 2023 · 25 citations
Related papers
- InterrogateLLM: Zero-Resource Hallucination Detection in LLM-Generated AnswersYakir Yehuda, Itzik Malkiel, Oren Barkan, Jonathan Weill et al.ACL 2024
- How Much Do LLMs Hallucinate across Languages? On Realistic Multilingual Estimation of LLM HallucinationSaad Obaid ul Islam, Anne Lauscher, Goran GlavasEMNLP 2025
- Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models with Metamorphic RelationsBorui Yang, Md Afif Al Mamun, Jie M. Zhang, Gias UddinFSE 2025 · 14 citations
- The Illusion of Progress: Re-evaluating Hallucination Detection in LLMsDenis Janiak, Jakub Binkowski, Albert Sawczyn, Bogdan Gabrys et al.EMNLP 2025
- Reference-free Hallucination Detection for Large Vision-Language ModelsQing Li, Jiahui Geng, Chenyang Lyu, Derui Zhu et al.EMNLP Findings 2024 · 16 citations
