Optimized Batch Prompting for Cost-effective LLMs
Zhaoxuan Ji, Xinlu Wang, Zhaojing Luo, Zhongle Xie, Meihui Zhang
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated exceptional performance in various real-world data management tasks through in-context learning (ICL), which involves structuring prompts with task descriptions and several demonstrations. However, most LLMs are not free and charge based on the number of input tokens. Specifically, for data management tasks, there may be massive related questions, leading to high inference cost due to redundant prompt content (i.e., overlapping demonstrations and repeated task descriptions). In this paper, we investigate the idea of batch prompting in leveraging LLMs for data management, which leads to cost-effective LLMs by grouping questions and demonstrations to perform inferences in batches. Current studies on batch prompting are preliminary and mostly based on heuristics, making it difficult to generalize to various types of tasks and adapt to different grouping strategies. To address these challenges, in this work we first formalize the batch prompting problem in general setting. Then, we study the hardness of this problem and propose efficient algorithms for adaptive grouping. Finally, we conduct comprehensive experiments on 14 datasets. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our solution consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines while consuming lower cost.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4fb465c1-169d-440a-b862-7745dfb10151Cited by top-tier papers2
- Can we trust LLM Self-Explanations for Entity Resolution?Tommaso Teofili, Donatella Firmani, Nick Koudas, Paolo Merialdo et al.VLDB 2026 · 2 citations
- Understanding LLM Performance Degradation in Multi-Instance Processing: The Roles of Instance Count and Context LengthJingxuan Chen, Mohammad Taher Pilehvar, José Camacho-ColladosACL 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on18
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark EvaluationDawei Gao, Haibin Wang, Yaliang Li, Xiuyu Sun et al.VLDB 2024 · 609 citations
- Deep Entity Matching with Pre-Trained Language ModelsYuliang Li, Jinfeng Li, Yoshihiko Suhara, AnHai Doan et al.VLDB 2021 · 484 citations
- A Survey on In-context LearningQingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng et al.EMNLP 2024 · 479 citations
- Hard Prompts Made Easy: Gradient-Based Discrete Optimization for Prompt Tuning and DiscoveryYuxin Wen, Neel Jain, John Kirchenbauer, Micah Goldblum et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 454 citations
Related papers
- Cost-Effective In-Context Learning for Entity Resolution: A Design Space ExplorationMeihao Fan, Xiaoyue Han, Ju Fan, Chengliang Chai et al.ICDE 2024 · 40 citations
- BatchPrompt: Accomplish more with lessJianzhe Lin, Maurice Diesendruck, Liang Du, Robin AbrahamICLR 2024 · 17 citations
- Batch Calibration: Rethinking Calibration for In-Context Learning and Prompt EngineeringHan Zhou, Xingchen Wan, Lev Proleev, Diana Mincu et al.ICLR 2024 · 90 citations
- Universal Self-Adaptive PromptingXingchen Wan, Ruoxi Sun, Hootan Nakhost, Hanjun Dai et al.EMNLP 2023 · 4 citations
- Demonstration-Free: Towards More Practical Log Parsing with Large Language ModelsYi Xiao, Van-Hoang Le, Hongyu ZhangASE 2024 · 9 citations
