Nucleus Decomposition in Probabilistic Graphs: Hardness and Algorithms
Fatemeh Esfahani, Venkatesh Srinivasan, Alex Thomo, Kui Wu
Abstract
Finding dense components in graphs is of great importance in analysing the structure of networks. Popular and computationally feasible frameworks for discovering dense subgraphs are core and truss decompositions. Recently, Sarıy üce et al. introduced nucleus decomposition, which uses r-cliques contained in s-cliques, where s > r, as the basis for defining dense subgraphs. Nucleus decomposition can reveal interesting subgraphs that can be missed by core and truss decompositions.
In this paper, we present nucleus decomposition in probabilistic graphs. The major questions we address are: How to define meaningfully nucleus decomposition in probabilistic graphs? How hard is computing nucleus decomposition in probabilistic graphs? Can we devise efficient algorithms for exact or approximate nucleus decomposition in large graphs?
We present three natural definitions of nucleus decomposition in probabilistic graphs: local, global, and weakly-global. We show that the local version is in PTIME, whereas global and weaklyglobal are #P-hard and NP-hard, respectively. We present an efficient and exact dynamic programming approach for the local case. Further, we present statistical approximations that can scale to bigger datasets without much loss of accuracy. For global and weakly-global decompositions we complement our intractability results by proposing efficient algorithms that give approximate solutions based on search space pruning and Monte-Carlo sampling. Extensive experiments show the scalability and efficiency of our algorithms. Compared to probabilistic core and truss decompositions, nucleus decomposition significantly outperforms in terms of density and clustering metrics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Theoretically and Practically Efficient Parallel Nucleus DecompositionJessica Shi, Laxman Dhulipala, Julian ShunVLDB 2022 · 10 citations
- Parallel Algorithms for Hierarchical Nucleus DecompositionJessica Shi, Laxman Dhulipala, Julian ShunSIGMOD 2024 · 2 citations
Builds on3
- Efficient Bitruss Decomposition for Large-scale Bipartite GraphsKai Wang, Xuemin Lin, Lu Qin, Wenjie Zhang et al.ICDE 2020 · 107 citations
- Efficient Probabilistic Truss Indexing on Uncertain GraphsZitan Sun, Xin Huang, Jianliang Xu, Francesco BonchiWWW 2021 · 21 citations
- STruD: Truss Decomposition of Simplicial ComplexesGiulia Preti, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Francesco BonchiWWW 2021 · 17 citations
Related papers
- Nucleus Decomposition Revisited: An Efficient Counting-Based ApproachWenqian Zhang, Zhengyi Yang, Dong Wen, Yi Ding et al.SIGMOD 2026 · 1 citation
- Most Probable Densest SubgraphsArkaprava Saha, Xiangyu Ke, Arijit Khan, Cheng LongICDE 2023 · 8 citations
- Efficient Algorithms for Density Decomposition on Large Static and Dynamic GraphsYalong Zhang, Ronghua Li, Qi Zhang, Hongchao Qin et al.VLDB 2024 · 2 citations
- Colorful h-star Core DecompositionSen Gao, Rong-Hua Li, Hongchao Qin, Hongzhi Chen et al.ICDE 2022 · 6 citations
- On Breaking Truss-Based CommunitiesHuiping Chen, Alessio Conte, Roberto Grossi, Grigorios Loukides et al.KDD 2021 · 11 citations
