Model-sharing Games: Analyzing Federated Learning Under Voluntary Participation
Kate Donahue, Jon M. Kleinberg
Abstract
Federated learning is a setting where agents, each with access to their own data source, combine models learned from local data to create a global model. If agents are drawing their data from different distributions, though, federated learning might produce a biased global model that is not optimal for each agent. This means that agents face a fundamental question: should they join the global model or stay with their local model? In this work, we show how this situation can be naturally analyzed through the framework of coalitional game theory. Motivated by these considerations, we propose the following game: there are heterogeneous players with different model parameters governing their data distribution and different amounts of data they have noisily drawn from their own distribution. Each player's goal is to obtain a model with minimal expected mean squared error (MSE) on their own distribution. They have a choice of fitting a model based solely on their own data, or combining their learned parameters with those of some subset of the other players. Combining models reduces the variance component of their error through access to more data, but increases the bias because of the heterogeneity of distributions. In this work, we derive exact expected MSE values for problems in linear regression and mean estimation. We use these values to analyze the resulting game in the framework of hedonic game theory; we study how players might divide into coalitions, where each set of players within a coalition jointly construct model(s). We analyze three methods of federation, modeling differing degrees of customization. In uniform federation, the agents collectively produce a single model. In coarse-grained federation, each agent can weight the global model together with their local model. In fine-grained federation, each agent can flexibly combine models from each other agent in the federation. For each method, we constructively analyze the stable partitions of players into coalitions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4f63bdef-569c-4932-8657-9b73022a3be6Cited by top-tier papers30
- Optimality and Stability in Federated Learning: A Game-theoretic ApproachKate Donahue, Jon M. KleinbergNeurIPS 2021 · 74 citations
- One for One, or All for All: Equilibria and Optimality of Collaboration in Federated LearningAvrim Blum, Nika Haghtalab, Richard Lanas Phillips, Han ShaoICML 2021 · 62 citations
- Optimizing the Collaboration Structure in Cross-Silo Federated LearningWenxuan Bao, Haohan Wang, Jun Wu, Jingrui HeICML 2023 · 39 citations
- Overcoming Data and Model heterogeneities in Decentralized Federated Learning via Synthetic AnchorsChun-Yin Huang, Kartik Srinivas, Xin Zhang, Xiaoxiao LiICML 2024 · 27 citations
- Fine-Tuning Games: Bargaining and Adaptation for General-Purpose ModelsBenjamin Laufer, Jon M. Kleinberg, Hoda HeidariWWW 2024 · 27 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Fairness in model-sharing gamesKate Donahue, Jon M. KleinbergWWW 2023 · 12 citations
- Fairness in Federated Learning via Core-StabilityBhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Linyi Li, Mintong Kang, Bo Li et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 49 citations
- Personalized Federated Learning with First Order Model OptimizationMichael Zhang, Karan Sapra, Sanja Fidler, Serena Yeung et al.ICLR 2021 · 414 citations
- PAGE: Equilibrate Personalization and Generalization in Federated LearningQian Chen, Zilong Wang, Jiaqi Hu, Haonan Yan et al.WWW 2024 · 7 citations
- Does Egalitarian Fairness Lead to Instability? The Fairness Bounds in Stable Federated Learning Under Altruistic BehaviorsJiashi Gao, Ziwei Wang, Xiangyu Zhao, Xin Yao et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
