Scalable Sampling for Nonsymmetric Determinantal Point Processes
Insu Han, Mike Gartrell, Jennifer Gillenwater, Elvis Dohmatob, Amin Karbasi
Abstract
A determinantal point process (DPP) on a collection of items is a model, parameterized by a symmetric kernel matrix, that assigns a probability to every subset of those items. Recent work shows that removing the kernel symmetry constraint, yielding nonsymmetric DPPs (NDPPs), can lead to significant predictive performance gains for machine learning applications. However, existing work leaves open the question of scalable NDPP sampling. There is only one known DPP sampling algorithm, based on Cholesky decomposition, that can directly apply to NDPPs as well. Unfortunately, its runtime is cubic in , and thus does not scale to large item collections. In this work, we first note that this algorithm can be transformed into a linear-time one for kernels with low-rank structure. Furthermore, we develop a scalable sublinear-time rejection sampling algorithm by constructing a novel proposal distribution. Additionally, we show that imposing certain structural constraints on the NDPP kernel enables us to bound the rejection rate in a way that depends only on the kernel rank. In our experiments we compare the speed of all of these samplers for a variety of real-world tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4edc82b3-e4dd-40b0-8c97-135a39793329Cited by top-tier papers2
- Scalable MCMC Sampling for Nonsymmetric Determinantal Point ProcessesInsu Han, Mike Gartrell, Elvis Dohmatob, Amin KarbasiICML 2022 · 5 citations
- Correlation-Aware Example Selection for In-Context Learning with Nonsymmetric Determinantal Point ProcessesQiunan Du, Zhiliang Tian, Zhen Huang, Kailun Bian et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on6
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Multi-Agent Determinantal Q-LearningYaodong Yang, Ying Wen, Jun Wang, Liheng Chen et al.ICML 2020 · 83 citations
- Sampling from a k-DPP without looking at all itemsDaniele Calandriello, Michal Derezinski, Michal ValkoNeurIPS 2020 · 30 citations
- Scalable Learning and MAP Inference for Nonsymmetric Determinantal Point ProcessesMike Gartrell, Insu Han, Elvis Dohmatob, Jennifer Gillenwater et al.ICLR 2021 · 19 citations
- Composable Core-sets for Determinant Maximization Problems via Spectral SpannersPiotr Indyk, Sepideh Mahabadi, Shayan Oveis Gharan, Alireza RezaeiSODA 2020 · 10 citations
Related papers
- Nonparametric estimation of continuous DPPs with kernel methodsMichaël Fanuel, Rémi BardenetNeurIPS 2021 · 3 citations
- Lazy and Fast Greedy MAP Inference for Determinantal Point ProcessShinichi Hemmi, Taihei Oki, Shinsaku Sakaue, Kaito Fujii et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 11 citations
- Small coresets via negative dependence: DPPs, linear statistics, and concentrationRémi Bardenet, Subhroshekhar Ghosh, Hugo Simon-Onfroy, Hoang Son TranNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- One-Pass Algorithms for MAP Inference of Nonsymmetric Determinantal Point ProcessesAravind Reddy, Ryan A. Rossi, Zhao Song, Anup B. Rao et al.ICML 2022 · 3 citations
- Optimal Sublinear Sampling of Spanning Trees and Determinantal Point Processes via Average-Case Entropic IndependenceNima Anari, Yang P. Liu, Thuy-Duong VuongFOCS 2022 · 1 citation
