Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Stochastic Adversary
Ziyuan Zhou, Guanjun Liu, Mengchu Zhou, Weiran Guo
Abstract
The performance of models trained by Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) is sensitive to perturbations in observations, lowering their trustworthiness in complex environments. Adversarial training is a valuable approach to enhance their performance robustness. However, existing methods often overfit to adversarial perturbations of observations and fail to incorporate prior information about the policy adopted by their protagonist agent, i.e., the primary one being trained. To address this important issue, this paper introduces Adversarial Training with Stochastic Adversary (ATSA), where the proposed adversary is trained online alongside the protagonist agent. The former consists of Stochastic Director (SDor) and SDorguided generaTor (STor). SDor performs policy perturbations by minimizing the expected team reward of protagonists and maximizing the entropy of its policy, while STor generates adversarial perturbations of observations by following SDor's guidance. We prove that SDor's soft policy converges to a global optimum according to factorized maximum-entropy MARL and leads to the optimal adversary. This paper also introduces an SDor-STor loss function to quantify the difference between a) perturbations in the agent's policy and b) those advised by SDor. We evaluate our ATSA on StarCraft II tasks and autonomous driving scenarios, demonstrating that a) it is robust against diverse perturbations of observations while maintaining outstanding performance in perturbation-free environments, and b) it outperforms the state-of-the-art methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4ed3054e-eef8-4e06-a9a8-9f6c4d9ace7dCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on16
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 1,352 citations
- QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-LearningJianhao Wang, Zhizhou Ren, Terry Liu, Yang Yu et al.ICLR 2021 · 595 citations
- Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning against Adversarial Perturbations on State ObservationsHuan Zhang, Hongge Chen, Chaowei Xiao, Bo Li et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 437 citations
- Robust Reinforcement Learning on State Observations with Learned Optimal AdversaryHuan Zhang, Hongge Chen, Duane S. Boning, Cho-Jui HsiehICLR 2021 · 212 citations
- Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning through Adversarial LossTuomas P. Oikarinen, Wang Zhang, Alexandre Megretski, Luca Daniel et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 134 citations
Related papers
- Who Is the Strongest Enemy? Towards Optimal and Efficient Evasion Attacks in Deep RLYanchao Sun, Ruijie Zheng, Yongyuan Liang, Furong HuangICLR 2022 · 82 citations
- Robust Multi-Agent Coordination via Evolutionary Generation of Auxiliary Adversarial AttackersLei Yuan, Ziqian Zhang, Ke Xue, Hao Yin et al.AAAI 2023 · 31 citations
- Maximum Entropy Heterogeneous-Agent Reinforcement LearningJiarong Liu, Yifan Zhong, Siyi Hu, Haobo Fu et al.ICLR 2024 · 27 citations
- Budget-Efficient Attacks and Robustness Training for Cooperative MARLJunyong Jiang, Xin Yuan, Longhe Lin, Songze Li et al.ICML 2026
- Efficient Adversarial Training without Attacking: Worst-Case-Aware Robust Reinforcement LearningYongyuan Liang, Yanchao Sun, Ruijie Zheng, Furong HuangNeurIPS 2022 · 79 citations
