Latent-Guided Reasoning: Empowering Small LLMs with Large-Model Thinking
Hanzhu Chen, Lin Yang, Jie Wang, Junhao Yan, Zhe Wang, Xize Liang, Jianye Hao
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning tasks, but their high computational costs limit their widespread practical application. We argue that this inefficiency arises from the tight coupling of high-level cognitive planning (devising the solution strategy) and low-level linguistic realization (generating step-by-step text). To address this challenge, we propose a novel collaborative framework that decouples these two processes through Latent Guidance. Our approach implements a division of labor: a large model acts as an Implicit Thinker, performing high-level cognitive planning and compressing its solution strategy into a set of compact latent guidance vectors. A small, efficient model then serves as an Explicit Executor, which receives this latent guidance to generate a concise and effective reasoning chain. This process is enabled by a dual-loss training objective, grounded in information-theoretic principles, where a reconstruction loss explicitly compels the latent guidance to become a high-fidelity representation of the full reasoning chain. Extensive experiments on 8 diverse reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our method substantially enhances the reasoning capabilities of small models across various scales (from 0.5B to 8B), allowing them to outperform strong baselines and exhibit superior generalization. Notably, our framework boosts small model accuracy by up to 13.9% over its standalone baseline. Our work introduces a new, theoretically-grounded paradigm for empowering small models with large-model thinking, substantially improving the performance-cost trade-off for complex reasoning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4ed004b1-1273-4ceb-a10b-2d5f086eb3d9Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on15
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth ApproachJonas Geiping, Sean McLeish, Neel Jain, John Kirchenbauer et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 431 citations
Related papers
- Accelerating Large Language Model Reasoning via Speculative SearchZhihai Wang, Jie Wang, Jilai Pan, Xilin Xia et al.ICML 2025
- PILOT: Planning via Internalized Latent Optimization Trajectories for Large Language ModelsHaoyu Zheng, Yun Zhu, Yuqian Yuan, Bo Yuan et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Learning to Reason over Continuous Tokens with Reinforcement LearningYiran Zhao, Yuhui Xu, Doyen Sahoo, Caiming Xiong et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Rethinking LLM Reasoning: From Explicit Trajectories to Latent RepresentationsCong Jiang, Xiaofeng Zhang, Fangzhi Zhu, XiaoWei Chen et al.ICLR 2026
- Synergistic Weak-Strong Collaboration by Aligning PreferencesYizhu Jiao, Xuchao Zhang, Zhaoyang Wang, Yubo Ma et al.ACL 2025
