Why is SAM Robust to Label Noise?
Christina Baek, J. Zico Kolter, Aditi Raghunathan
Abstract
Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) is most known for achieving state-of the-art performances on natural image and language tasks. However, its most pronounced improvements (of tens of percent) is rather in the presence of label noise. Understanding SAM's label noise robustness requires a departure from characterizing the robustness of minimas lying in "flatter" regions of the loss landscape. In particular, the peak performance under label noise occurs with early stopping, far before the loss converges. We decompose SAM's robustness into two effects: one induced by changes to the logit term and the other induced by changes to the network Jacobian. The first can be observed in linear logistic regression where SAM provably up-weights the gradient contribution from clean examples. Although this explicit up-weighting is also observable in neural networks, when we intervene and modify SAM to remove this effect, surprisingly, we see no visible degradation in performance. We infer that SAM's effect in deeper networks is instead explained entirely by the effect SAM has on the network Jacobian. We theoretically derive the implicit regularization induced by this Jacobian effect in two layer linear networks. Motivated by our analysis, we see that cheaper alternatives to SAM that explicitly induce these regularization effects largely recover the benefits in deep networks trained on real-world datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4ec45230-ea7e-4ff0-a5fd-9df8b8edb0cbCited by top-tier papers11
- An Analysis of Concept Bottleneck Models: Measuring, Understanding, and Mitigating the Impact of Noisy AnnotationsSeonghwan Park, Jueun Mun, Donghyun Oh, Namhoon LeeNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- Enhancing Sample Selection Against Label Noise by Cutting Mislabeled Easy ExamplesSuqin Yuan, Lei Feng, Bo Han, Tongliang LiuNeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- Lookbehind-SAM: k steps back, 1 step forwardGonçalo Mordido, Pranshu Malviya, Aristide Baratin, Sarath ChandarICML 2024 · 4 citations
- Membership Privacy Risks of Sharpness Aware MinimizationYoung In Kim, Andrea Agiollo, Pratiksha Agrawal, Johannes O. Royset et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Improving Model-Based Reinforcement Learning by Converging to Flatter MinimaShrinivas Ramasubramanian, Benjamin Freed, Alexandre Capone, Jeff G. SchneiderNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
Builds on21
- Sharpness-aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving GeneralizationPierre Foret, Ariel Kleiner, Hossein Mobahi, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2021 · 1,861 citations
- Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data HurtPreetum Nakkiran, Gal Kaplun, Yamini Bansal, Tristan Yang et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,108 citations
- Adversarial Weight Perturbation Helps Robust GeneralizationDongxian Wu, Shu-Tao Xia, Yisen WangNeurIPS 2020 · 917 citations
- Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy LabelsSheng Liu, Jonathan Niles-Weed, Narges Razavian, Carlos Fernandez-GrandaNeurIPS 2020 · 798 citations
- Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find ThemYiding Jiang, Behnam Neyshabur, Hossein Mobahi, Dilip Krishnan et al.ICLR 2020 · 705 citations
Related papers
- Why Does Sharpness-Aware Minimization Generalize Better Than SGD?Zixiang Chen, Junkai Zhang, Yiwen Kou, Xiangning Chen et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 32 citations
- How Sharpness-Aware Minimization Minimizes Sharpness?Kaiyue Wen, Tengyu Ma, Zhiyuan LiICLR 2023 · 3 citations
- Sharpness-Aware Minimization Can Hallucinate MinimizersChanwoong Park, Uijeong Jang, Ernest Ryu, Insoon YangICML 2026
- On Saddle Point Avoidance and Stationary Distribution of Sharpness-Aware MinimizationTao Sun, Fan Jia, Bao WangKDD 2026 · 1 citation
- Sharpness-Aware Minimization Efficiently Selects Flatter Minima Late In TrainingZhanpeng Zhou, Mingze Wang, Yuchen Mao, Bingrui Li et al.ICLR 2025
