Determining the Largest Overlap between Tables
Luca Zecchini, Tobias Bleifuß, Giovanni Simonini, Sonia Bergamaschi, Felix Naumann
Abstract
Both on the Web and in data lakes, it is possible to detect much redundant data in the form of largely overlapping pairs of tables. In many cases, this overlap is not accidental and provides significant information about the relatedness of the tables. Unfortunately, efficiently quantifying the overlap between two tables is not trivial. In particular, detecting their largest overlap, i.e., their largest common subtable, is a computationally challenging problem. As the information overlap may not occur in contiguous portions of the tables, only the ability to permute columns and rows can reveal it.
The detection of the largest overlap can help us in relevant tasks such as the discovery of multiple coexisting versions of the same table, which can present differences in the completeness and correctness of the conveyed information. Automatically detecting these highly similar, matching tables would allow us to guarantee their consistency through data cleaning or change propagation, but also to eliminate redundancy to free up storage space or to save additional work for the editors.
We present the first formal definition of this problem, and with it Sloth, our solution to efficiently detect the largest overlap between two tables. We experimentally demonstrate on real-world datasets its efficacy in solving this task, analyzing its performance and showing its impact on multiple use cases.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4eb48cd2-ba09-4f23-9f2c-cf038858a315Cited by top-tier papers2
- Shape-Agnostic Table Overlap Discovery: A Maximum Common Subhypergraph ApproachGe Lee, Shixun Huang, Zhifeng Bao, Felix Naumann et al.SIGMOD 2026 · 1 citation
- Table Overlap Estimation through Graph EmbeddingsFrancesco Pugnaloni, Luca Zecchini, Matteo Paganelli, Matteo Lissandrini et al.SIGMOD 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on11
- TURL: Table Understanding through Representation LearningXiang Deng, Huan Sun, Alyssa Lees, You Wu et al.VLDB 2021 · 2,406 citations
- TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular DataPengcheng Yin, Graham Neubig, Wen-tau Yih, Sebastian RiedelACL 2020 · 417 citations
- Creating Embeddings of Heterogeneous Relational Datasets for Data Integration TasksRiccardo Cappuzzo, Paolo Papotti, Saravanan ThirumuruganathanSIGMOD 2020 · 139 citations
- Dataset Discovery in Data LakesAlex Bogatu, Alvaro A. A. Fernandes, Norman W. Paton, Nikolaos KonstantinouICDE 2020 · 118 citations
- Finding Related Tables in Data Lakes for Interactive Data ScienceYi Zhang, Zachary G. IvesSIGMOD 2020 · 98 citations
Related papers
- Novel Table SearchBesat Kassaie, Renée J. MillerICDE 2026
- LakeBench: A Benchmark for Discovering Joinable and Unionable Tables in Data LakesYuhao Deng, Chengliang Chai, Lei Cao, Qin Yuan et al.VLDB 2024 · 36 citations
- Gen-T: Table Reclamation in Data LakesGrace Fan, Roee Shraga, Renée J. MillerICDE 2024 · 5 citations
- Integrating Data Lake TablesAamod Khatiwada, Roee Shraga, Wolfgang Gatterbauer, Renée J. MillerVLDB 2023 · 59 citations
- TabSketchFM: Sketch-Based Tabular Representation Learning for Data Discovery Over Data LakesAamod Khatiwada, Harsha Kokel, Ibrahim Abdelaziz, Subhajit Chaudhury et al.ICDE 2025 · 3 citations
