GenJoin: Conditional Generative Plan-to-Plan Query Optimizer that Learns from Subplan Hints
Pavel Sulimov, Claude Lehmann, Kurt Stockinger
Abstract
Query optimization has become a research area where classical algorithms are being challenged by machine learning algorithms. At the same time, recent trends in learned query optimizers have shown that it is prudent to take advantage of decades of database research and augment classical query optimizers by shrinking the plan search space through different types of hints (e.g. by specifying the join type, scan type or the order of joins) rather than completely replacing the classical query optimizer with machine learning models. It is especially relevant for cases when classical optimizers cannot fully enumerate all logical and physical plans and, as an alternative, need to rely on less robust approaches like genetic algorithms. However, even symbiotically learned query optimizers are hampered by the need for vast amounts of training data, slow plan generation during inference and unstable results across various workload conditions. In this paper, we present GenJoin - a novel learned query optimizer that considers the query optimization problem as a generative task and is capable of learning from a random set of subplan hints to produce query plans that outperform classical optimizers. GenJoin is the first learned query optimizer that significantly and consistently outperforms PostgreSQL as well as state-of-the-art methods on two well-known real-world benchmarks across a variety of workloads using rigorous machine learning evaluations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4e768919-9ed5-4dc4-8f46-a26a0ec42649Builds on19
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Bao: Making Learned Query Optimization PracticalRyan Marcus, Parimarjan Negi, Hongzi Mao, Nesime Tatbul et al.SIGMOD 2021 · 242 citations
- Reinforcement Learning with Tree-LSTM for Join Order SelectionXiang Yu, Guoliang Li, Chengliang Chai, Nan TangICDE 2020 · 168 citations
- DeepDB: Learn from Data, not from Queries!Benjamin Hilprecht, Andreas Schmidt, Moritz Kulessa, Alejandro Molina et al.VLDB 2020 · 154 citations
- NeuroCard: One Cardinality Estimator for All TablesZongheng Yang, Amog Kamsetty, Sifei Luan, Eric Liang et al.VLDB 2021 · 138 citations
Related papers
- Cost-based or Learning-based? A Hybrid Query Optimizer for Query Plan SelectionXiang Yu, Chengliang Chai, Guoliang Li, Jiabin LiuVLDB 2022 · 82 citations
- Lero: A Learning-to-Rank Query OptimizerRong Zhu, Wei Chen, Bolin Ding, Xingguang Chen et al.VLDB 2023 · 102 citations
- Simple Adaptive Query Processing vs. Learned Query Optimizers: Observations and AnalysisYunjia Zhang, Yannis Chronis, Jignesh M. Patel, Theodoros RekatsinasVLDB 2023 · 20 citations
- FASTgres: Making Learned Query Optimizer Hinting EffectiveLucas Woltmann, Jerome Thiessat, Claudio Hartmann, Dirk Habich et al.VLDB 2023 · 40 citations
- RankPQO: Learning-to-Rank for Parametric Query OptimizationSongsong Mo, Yue Zhao, Zhifeng Bao, Quanqing Xu et al.VLDB 2025 · 3 citations
