Dataset Distillation for Memorized Data: Soft Labels can Leak Held-Out Teacher Knowledge
Freya Behrens, Lenka Zdeborová
Abstract
Dataset distillation aims to compress training data into fewer examples via a teacher, from which a student can learn effectively. While its success is often attributed to structure in the data, modern neural networks also memorize specific facts, but if and how such memorized information can be transferred in distillation settings remains less understood. While this transfer may be desirable in some applications, it also raises privacy concerns, where preventing such leakage is crucial. In this work, we show that students trained on soft labels from teachers can indeed achieve non-trivial accuracy on held-out memorized data they never directly observed. This effect persists on structured data when the teacher has not generalized. To understand this effect in isolation, we consider finite random i.i.d. datasets where generalization is a priori impossible and a successful teacher fit implies pure memorization. Still, students can learn non-trivial information about the held-out data, in some cases up to perfect accuracy. For multinomial logistic classification and single layer MLPs, we show this corresponds to the setting where the teacher can be recovered functionally -- the student matches the teacher's predictions on all possible inputs, including the held-out memorized data. We empirically show that these phenomena strongly depend on the sample complexity and the temperature with which the logits are smoothed, but persist across varying network capacities, architectures and dataset compositions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4e6c2ca3-f2fa-4bed-842e-bace32056070Cited by top-tier papers2
- Towards Understanding Subliminal Learning: When and How Hidden Biases TransferSimon Schrodi, Elias Kempf, Fazl Barez, Thomas BroxICLR 2026 · 30 citations
- ManifoldGD: Training-Free Hierarchical Manifold Guidance for Diffusion-Based Dataset DistillationAyush Roy, Wei-Yang Alex Lee, Rudrasis Chakraborty, Vishnu Suresh LokhandeCVPR 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on10
- Rethinking Soft Labels for Knowledge Distillation: A Bias-Variance Tradeoff PerspectiveHelong Zhou, Liangchen Song, Jiajie Chen, Ye Zhou et al.ICLR 2021 · 209 citations
- A statistical perspective on distillationAditya Krishna Menon, Ankit Singh Rawat, Sashank J. Reddi, Seungyeon Kim et al.ICML 2021 · 97 citations
- Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilityNeel Nanda, Lawrence Chan, Tom Lieberum, Jess Smith et al.ICLR 2023 · 54 citations
- A Label is Worth A Thousand Images in Dataset DistillationTian Qin, Zhiwei Deng, David Alvarez-MelisNeurIPS 2024 · 39 citations
- What is Dataset Distillation Learning?William Yang, Ye Zhu, Zhiwei Deng, Olga RussakovskyICML 2024 · 13 citations
Related papers
- Students Parrot Their Teachers: Membership Inference on Model DistillationMatthew Jagielski, Milad Nasr, Katherine Lee, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 53 citations
- Remember the Past: Distilling Datasets into Addressable Memories for Neural NetworksZhiwei Deng, Olga RussakovskyNeurIPS 2022 · 140 citations
- Toward Understanding Adversarial Distillation: Why Robust Teachers FailHongsin Lee, Hye Won ChungICML 2026
- What Knowledge Gets Distilled in Knowledge Distillation?Utkarsh Ojha, Yuheng Li, Anirudh Sundara Rajan, Yingyu Liang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 58 citations
- Does Knowledge Distillation Really Work?Samuel Stanton, Pavel Izmailov, Polina Kirichenko, Alexander A. Alemi et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 318 citations
