Visual Anagrams Reveal Hidden Differences in Holistic Shape Processing Across Vision Models
Fenil R. Doshi, Thomas Fel, Talia Konkle, George A. Alvarez
Abstract
Humans are able to recognize objects based on both local texture cues and the configuration of object parts, yet contemporary vision models primarily harvest local texture cues, yielding brittle, non-compositional features. Work on shape-vstexture bias has pitted shape and texture representations in opposition, measuring shape relative to texture, ignoring the possibility that models (and humans) can simultaneously rely on both types of cues, and obscuring the absolute quality of both types of representation. We therefore recast shape evaluation as a matter of absolute configural competence, operationalized by the Configural Shape Score (CSS), which (i) measures the ability to recognize both images in Object-Anagram pairs that preserve local texture while permuting global part arrangement to depict different object categories. Across 86 convolutional, transformer, and hybrid models, CSS (ii) uncovers a broad spectrum of configural sensitivity with fully selfsupervised and language-aligned transformers -exemplified by DINOv2, SigLIP2 and EVA-CLIP -occupying the top end of the CSS spectrum. Mechanistic probes reveal that (iii) high-CSS networks depend on long-range interactions: radiuscontrolled attention masks abolish performance showing a distinctive U-shaped integration profile, and representational-similarity analyses expose a mid-depth transition from local to global coding. A BagNet control, whose receptive fields straddle patch seams, remains at chance (iv), ruling out any "border-hacking" strategies. Finally, (v) we show that configural shape score also predicts other shapedependent evals (e.g.,foreground bias, spectral and noise robustness). Overall, we propose that the path toward truly robust, generalizable, and human-like vision systems may not lie in forcing an artificial choice between shape and texture, but rather in architectural and learning frameworks that seamlessly integrate both local-texture and global configural shape. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4e55804a-5447-4302-8c29-056dda300dcbBuilds on28
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- A ConvNet for the 2020sZhuang Liu, Hanzi Mao, Chao-Yuan Wu, Christoph Feichtenhofer et al.CVPR 2022 · 6,782 citations
- BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image TransformersHangbo Bao, Li Dong, Songhao Piao, Furu WeiICLR 2022 · 3,632 citations
- Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-TrainingXiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, Lucas BeyerICCV 2023 · 2,932 citations
Related papers
- S2C2Seg: Semantic-Spatial Consistency and Category Optimization for Open-Vocabulary SegmentationYuhao Qing, Yueying Wang, Chaoyang Chen, Weidong Zhang et al.CVPR 2026
- How can embedding models bind concepts?Arnas Uselis, Darina Koishigarina, Seong Joon OhICML 2026
- Left–Right Symmetry Breaking in CLIP-Style Vision-Language Models Trained on Synthetic Spatial-Relation DataTakaki Yamamoto, Chihiro Noguchi, Toshihiro TanizawaICML 2026
- Emergence of Shape Bias in Convolutional Neural Networks through Activation SparsityTianqin Li, Ziqi Wen, Yangfan Li, Tai Sing LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 24 citations
- Revisiting Visual Corruptions in LVLMs: A Shape-Texture Perspective on Model FailuresXinkuan Qiu, Meina Kan, Zhenliang He, Yongbin Zhou et al.CVPR 2026
