BLAG: Improving the Accuracy of Blacklists
Sivaramakrishnan Ramanathan, Jelena Mirkovic, Minlan Yu
Abstract
—IP address blacklists are a useful source of information about repeat attackers. Such information can be used to prioritize which traffic to divert for deeper inspection (e.g., repeat offender traffic), or which traffic to serve first (e.g., traffic from sources that are not blacklisted). But blacklists also suffer from overspecialization – each list is geared towards a specific purpose – and they may be inaccurate due to misclassification or stale information. We propose BLAG, a system that evaluates and aggregates multiple blacklists feeds, producing a more useful, accurate and timely master blacklist , tailored to the specific customer network. BLAG uses a sample of the legitimate sources of the customer network’s inbound traffic to evaluate the accuracy of each blacklist over regions of address space. It then leverages recommendation systems to select the most accurate information to aggregate into its master blacklist. Finally, BLAG identifies portions of the master blacklist that can be expanded into larger address regions (e.g. /24 prefixes) to uncover more malicious addresses with minimum collateral damage. Our evaluation of 157 blacklists of various attack types and three ground-truth datasets shows that BLAG achieves high specificity up to 99%, improves recall by up to 114 times compared to competing approaches, and detects attacks up to 13.7 days faster, which makes it a promising approach for blacklist generation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers15
- Realtime Robust Malicious Traffic Detection via Frequency Domain AnalysisChuanpu Fu, Qi Li, Meng Shen, Ke XuCCS 2021 · 194 citations
- Point Cloud Analysis for ML-Based Malicious Traffic Detection: Reducing Majorities of False Positive AlarmsChuanpu Fu, Qi Li, Ke Xu, Jianping WuCCS 2023 · 30 citations
- Warmonger: Inflicting Denial-of-Service via Serverless Functions in the CloudJunjie Xiong, Mingkui Wei, Zhuo Lu, Yao LiuCCS 2021 · 21 citations
- "Get in Researchers; We're Measuring Reproducibility": A Reproducibility Study of Machine Learning Papers in Tier 1 Security ConferencesDaniel Olszewski, Allison Lu, Carson Stillman, Kevin Warren et al.CCS 2023 · 19 citations
- SIRAJ: A Unified Framework for Aggregation of Malicious Entity DetectorsSaravanan Thirumuruganathan, Mohamed Nabeel, Euijin Choo, Issa Khalil et al.S&P 2022 · 13 citations
Builds on3
- Tranco: A Research-Oriented Top Sites Ranking Hardened Against ManipulationVictor Le Pochat, Tom van Goethem, Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob, Maciej Korczynski et al.NDSS 2019 · 826 citations
- Reading the Tea leaves: A Comparative Analysis of Threat IntelligenceVector Guo Li, Matthew Dunn, Paul Pearce, Damon McCoy et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 123 citations
- Platforms in Everything: Analyzing Ground-Truth Data on the Anatomy and Economics of Bullet-Proof HostingArman Noroozian, Jan Koenders, Eelco van Veldhuizen, Carlos Hernandez Gañán et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 40 citations
Related papers
- Under the Shadow of Sunshine: Understanding and Detecting Bulletproof Hosting on Legitimate Service Provider NetworksSumayah A. Alrwais, Xiaojing Liao, Xianghang Mi, Peng Wang et al.S&P 2017 · 51 citations
- Cloak of Visibility: Detecting When Machines Browse a Different WebLuca Invernizzi, Kurt Thomas, Alexandros Kapravelos, Oxana Comanescu et al.S&P 2016 · 93 citations
- MANTIS: Detection of Zero-Day Malicious Domains Leveraging Low Reputed Hosting InfrastructureFatih Deniz, Mohamed Nabeel, Ting Yu, Issa KhalilS&P 2025
- Where are you taking me?Understanding Abusive Traffic Distribution SystemsJanos Szurdi, Meng Luo, Brian Kondracki, Nick Nikiforakis et al.WWW 2021 · 13 citations
- Secure IP Address Allocation at Cloud ScaleEric Pauley, Kyle Domico, Blaine Hoak, Ryan Sheatsley et al.NDSS 2025
