Two-Layer Convolutional Autoencoders Trained on Normal Data Provably Detect Unseen Anomalies
Yanbo Chen, Weiwei Liu
Abstract
Anomaly detection refers to the techniques that identify (probably unseen) rare or suspicious data that deviate significantly from the pre-defined normal data (Chalapathy & Chawla, 2019; Ruff et al., 2021). Empirical studies have observed that generative models trained on normal data tend to produce larger reconstruction errors when reconstructing anomalies. Based on this observation, researchers have developed various anomaly detection methods, referred to as reconstruction-based anomaly detection (RBAD) (Lv et al., 2024; Li et al., 2024) in the literature.
Despite the empirical success of RBAD, the theoretical understanding of RBAD is still limited. This paper provides a theoretical analysis of RBAD. We analyze the training dynamics of a 2-layer convolutional autoencoder and introduce the cone set of the features. We prove that the cone sets of the normal features would absorb the (convolutional) kernels of the autoencoder during training and use these absorbed kernels to reconstruct the inputs. The absorbed kernels are more aligned with the normal features, which explains the cause of the reconstruction error gap between the normal data and the anomalies. Synthesized experiments are provided to validate our theoretical findings. We also visualize the training dynamics of the autoencoder on real-world data, demonstrating our proposed cone set intuition.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4d25a15c-fb94-431e-bf58-4c1ee3e0016eBuilds on11
- Toward Understanding the Feature Learning Process of Self-supervised Contrastive LearningZixin Wen, Yuanzhi LiICML 2021 · 162 citations
- Towards Understanding Ensemble, Knowledge Distillation and Self-Distillation in Deep LearningZeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi LiICLR 2023 · 151 citations
- Detecting Semantic AnomaliesFaruk Ahmed, Aaron C. CourvilleAAAI 2020 · 93 citations
- Feature Purification: How Adversarial Training Performs Robust Deep LearningZeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi LiFOCS 2021 · 83 citations
- On Diffusion Modeling for Anomaly DetectionVictor Livernoche, Vineet Jain, Yashar Hezaveh, Siamak RavanbakhshICLR 2024 · 74 citations
Related papers
- CurvGAD: Leveraging Curvature for Enhanced Graph Anomaly DetectionKarish Grover, Geoffrey J. Gordon, Christos FaloutsosICML 2025
- COGNOS: Universal Enhancement for Time Series Anomaly Detection via Constrained Gaussian-Noise Optimization and SmoothingWenlong Shang, Shihao Tian, Xutong Wan, Peng ChangICML 2026
- Temporal-Frequency Masked Autoencoders for Time Series Anomaly DetectionYuchen Fang, Jiandong Xie, Yan Zhao, Lu Chen et al.ICDE 2024 · 45 citations
- State-Derivative-Aware Neural Controlled Differential Equations for Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection and DiagnosisXin Sun, Heng Zhou, Yuhao Wu, Chao LiAAAI 2026
- Dinomaly: The Less Is More Philosophy in Multi-Class Unsupervised Anomaly DetectionJia Guo, Shuai Lu, Weihang Zhang, Fang Chen et al.CVPR 2025
