Lune

ICML2025Top-tier venue

Is Complex Query Answering Really Complex?

Cosimo Gregucci, Bo Xiong, Daniel Hernández, Lorenzo Loconte, Pasquale Minervini, Steffen Staab, Antonio Vergari

2025Year
1Top-tier citations

Abstract

Complex query answering (CQA) on knowledge graphs (KGs) is gaining momentum as a challenging reasoning task. In this paper, we show that the current benchmarks for CQA might not be as complex as we think, as the way they are built distorts our perception of progress in this field. For example, we find that in these benchmarks, most queries (up to 98% for some query types) can be reduced to simpler problems, e.g. link prediction, where only one link needs to be predicted.The performance of state-of-the-art CQA models decreases significantly when such models are evaluated on queries that cannot be reduced to easier types. Thus, we propose a set of more challenging benchmarks composed of queries that require models to reason over multiple hops and better reflect the construction of real-world KGs. In a systematic empirical investigation, the new benchmarks show that current methods leave much to be desired from current CQA methods. 1 Not to be confused with the computational complexity of query answering (Dalvi & Suciu, 2012). 2 Also known as projection in related works (Ren et al., 2023) .

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 4d130f92-0736-450c-8c27-89e48d4437f3

Cited by top-tier papers1

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on13

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines