TTT-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Reasoning Ability with Simple and Novel Tic-Tac-Toe-style Games
Prakamya Mishra, Jiang Liu, Jialian Wu, Xiaodong Yu, Zicheng Liu, Emad Barsoum
Abstract
Large reasoning models (LRMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities across a broad range of tasks including Olympiadlevel mathematical problems, indicating evidence of their complex reasoning abilities. While many reasoning benchmarks focus on the STEM domain, the ability of LRMs to reason correctly in broader task domains remains underexplored. In this work, we introduce TTT-Bench, a new benchmark that is designed to evaluate basic strategic, spatial, and logical reasoning abilities in LRMs through a suite of four two-player Tic-Tac-Toe-style games that humans can effortlessly solve from a young age. We propose a simple yet scalable programmatic approach for generating verifiable two-player game problems for TTT-Bench. Although these games are trivial for humans, they require reasoning about the intentions of the opponent, as well as the game board's spatial configurations, to ensure a win. We evaluate a diverse set of state-of-the-art LRMs, and discover that the models that excel at hard math problems frequently fail at these simple reasoning games. Further testing reveals that our evaluated reasoning models score on average ↓ 41% & ↓ 5% lower on TTT-Bench compared to MATH 500 & AIME 2024 respectively, with larger models achieving higher performance using shorter reasoning traces, where most of the models struggle on long-term strategic reasoning situations on simple and new TTT-Bench tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4cec6364-b978-40cf-b523-5098be706a86Builds on7
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- GTBench: Uncovering the Strategic Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs via Game-Theoretic EvaluationsJinhao Duan, Renming Zhang, James Diffenderfer, Bhavya Kailkhura et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 79 citations
- OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific ProblemsChaoqun He, Renjie Luo, Yuzhuo Bai, Shengding Hu et al.ACL 2024 · 18 citations
- UNO Arena for Evaluating Sequential Decision-Making Capability of Large Language ModelsZhanyue Qin, Haochuan Wang, Deyuan Liu, Ziyang Song et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
Related papers
- 3DSRBENCH: A Comprehensive 3D Spatial Reasoning BenchmarkWufei Ma, Haoyu Chen, Guofeng Zhang, Yu-Cheng Chou et al.ICCV 2025 · 15 citations
- GeoGramBench: Benchmarking the Geometric Program Reasoning in Modern LLMsShixian Luo, Zhu zezhou, Yu Yuan, Yuncheng Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 15 citations
- VisuLogic: A Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Reasoning in Multi-modal Large Language ModelsWeiye Xu, Jiahao Wang, Weiyun Wang, Zhe Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 103 citations
- SATBench: Benchmarking LLMs' Logical Reasoning via Automated Puzzle Generation from SAT FormulasAnjiang Wei, Yuheng Wu, Yingjia Wan, Tarun Suresh et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Can LLMs Reason Structurally? Benchmarking via the lens of Data StructuresYu He, Yingxi Li, Colin White, Ellen VitercikICML 2026 · 3 citations
