Offline RL by Reward-Weighted Fine-Tuning for Conversation Optimization
Subhojyoti Mukherjee, Viet Dac Lai, Raghavendra Addanki, Ryan Rossi, Seunghyun Yoon, Trung Bui, Anup B. Rao, Jayakumar Subramanian, Branislav Kveton
Abstract
Offline reinforcement learning (RL) is a variant of RL where the policy is learned from a previously collected dataset of trajectories and rewards. In our work, we propose a practical approach to offline RL with large language models (LLMs). We recast the problem as reward-weighted fine-tuning, which can be solved using similar techniques to supervised fine-tuning (SFT). To showcase the value of our approach, we apply it to learning short-horizon question-answering policies of a fixed length, where the agent reasons about potential answers or asks clarifying questions. Our work stands in a stark contrast to state-of-the-art methods in this domain, based on SFT and direct preference optimization, which have additional hyper-parameters and do not directly optimize for rewards. We compare to them empirically, and report major gains in both optimized rewards and language quality.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4c90a43e-e44f-4136-9fca-b408ad1c14b7Cited by top-tier papers2
- Good SFT Optimizes for SFT, Better SFT Prepares for Reinforcement LearningDylan Zhang, Yufeng Xu, Haojin Wang, Qingzhi Chen et al.ICML 2026 · 8 citations
- DRIFT: Decoupled Rollouts and Importance-Weighted Fine-Tuning for Efficient Multi-Turn OptimizationJian Mu, Tianyi Lin, Chengwei Qin, Zhongxiang Dai et al.ICML 2026
Builds on23
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied AgentsWenlong Huang, Pieter Abbeel, Deepak Pathak, Igor MordatchICML 2022 · 1,539 citations
Related papers
- Q-SFT: Q-Learning for Language Models via Supervised Fine-TuningJoey Hong, Anca D. Dragan, Sergey LevineICLR 2025
- On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward RectificationYongliang Wu, Yizhou Zhou, Ziheng Zhou, Yingzhe Peng et al.ICLR 2026 · 130 citations
- LongReward: Improving Long-context Large Language Models with AI FeedbackJiajie Zhang, Zhongni Hou, Xin Lv, Shulin Cao et al.ACL 2025 · 32 citations
- Asymmetric REINFORCE for off-Policy Reinforcement Learning: Balancing positive and negative rewardsCharles Arnal, Gaëtan Narozniak, Vivien Cabannes, Yunhao Tang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 30 citations
- Direct Preference-based Policy Optimization without Reward ModelingGaon An, Junhyeok Lee, Xingdong Zuo, Norio Kosaka et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 61 citations
