EdgeRefine: Privacy-Utility Balance for Graphs via Jaccard Sampling under Edge Differential Privacy
Wenxiu Ding, Muzhi Liu, Zheng Yan, Mingjun Wang, Yifan Zhao, Qiao Liu
Abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown considerable success in learning from graph-structured data. However, their application in privacy-sensitive areas remains difficult as the structural information of graphs is prone to leaking sensitive link information. To satisfy edge-level differential privacy, a common approach is to directly inject noise into all elements of the graph's adjacency matrix, thereby obfuscating the existence of any single edge. While increased noise strengthens privacy protection, excessive noise reduces utility. Privacy-utility balance becomes a major barrier to practical privacy-preserving graph learning. To address this issue, we propose EdgeRefine, a new local differential privacy framework that rethinks the privacy-utility trade-off in graph learning through adaptive edge refinement. EdgeRefine first estimates edge-existence probabilities using Jaccard similarity and ranks edges accordingly for noisy edge removal. To ensure the sparsity and reliability of the final graph, we leverage the privacy budget 𝜖 to determine the ratio of true to false edges, sample them separately based on the previously obtained probability ranking, and then control the total number of edges with a separate sampling rate 𝑘. We conducted extensive experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of EdgeRefine, which achieves accuracy comparable to the noise-free baseline and performs much better than other privacy-preserving methods on various datasets and GNN architectures. Under privacy budget 𝜖 = 2.5, EdgeRefine achieves significant node classification accuracy improvements over state-of-the-art baselines: 17.8% on ACM under GAT and 19.7% on Cora under GCN. In graph classification task, an average accuracy degradation of around 5% has also been achieved compared to noise-free baseline. Under graph reconstruction attacks, EdgeRefine maintains relative absolute error levels consistently above 1 across all privacy budgets (averaging 1.962 on Cora and 1.472 on AMAP), indicating strong resilience against privacy leakage. CCS Concepts • Security and privacy; • Computing methodologies → Machine learning; • Theory of computation → Graph algorithms analysis;
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on8
- Generating Synthetic Decentralized Social Graphs with Local Differential PrivacyZhan Qin, Ting Yu, Yin Yang, Issa Khalil et al.CCS 2017 · 266 citations
- LINKTELLER: Recovering Private Edges from Graph Neural Networks via Influence AnalysisFan Wu, Yunhui Long, Ce Zhang, Bo LiS&P 2022 · 125 citations
- MuSe-GNN: Learning Unified Gene Representation From Multimodal Biological Graph DataTianyu Liu, Yuge Wang, Rex Ying, Hongyu ZhaoNeurIPS 2023 · 44 citations
- Distributionally Robust Graph-based Recommendation SystemBohao Wang, Jiawei Chen, Changdong Li, Sheng Zhou et al.WWW 2024 · 42 citations
- Blink: Link Local Differential Privacy in Graph Neural Networks via Bayesian EstimationXiaochen Zhu, Vincent Y. F. Tan, Xiaokui XiaoCCS 2023 · 16 citations
Related papers
- GAP: Differentially Private Graph Neural Networks with Aggregation PerturbationSina Sajadmanesh, Ali Shahin Shamsabadi, Aurélien Bellet, Daniel Gatica-PerezUSENIX Security 2023
- Achieving Personalized Privacy-Preserving Graph Neural Network via Topology AwarenessDian Lei, Zijun Song, Yanli Yuan, Chunhai Li et al.WWW 2025 · 6 citations
- Differentially Private Decoupled Graph Convolutions for Multigranular Topology ProtectionEli Chien, Wei-Ning Chen, Chao Pan, Pan Li et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 33 citations
- LPGNet: Link Private Graph Networks for Node ClassificationAashish Kolluri, Teodora Baluta, Bryan Hooi, Prateek SaxenaCCS 2022 · 24 citations
- Locally Private Graph Neural NetworksSina Sajadmanesh, Daniel Gatica-PerezCCS 2021 · 124 citations
