Neural Algorithmic Reasoners are Implicit Planners
Andreea Deac, Petar Velickovic, Ognjen Milinkovic, Pierre-Luc Bacon, Jian Tang, Mladen Nikolic
Abstract
Implicit planning has emerged as an elegant technique for combining learned models of the world with end-to-end model-free reinforcement learning. We study the class of implicit planners inspired by value iteration, an algorithm that is guaranteed to yield perfect policies in fully-specified tabular environments. We find that prior approaches either assume that the environment is provided in such a tabular form-which is highly restrictive-or infer "local neighbourhoods" of states to run value iteration over-for which we discover an algorithmic bottleneck effect. This effect is caused by explicitly running the planning algorithm based on scalar predictions in every state, which can be harmful to data efficiency if such scalars are improperly predicted. We propose eXecuted Latent Value Iteration Networks (XLVINs), which alleviate the above limitations. Our method performs all planning computations in a high-dimensional latent space, breaking the algorithmic bottleneck. It maintains alignment with value iteration by carefully leveraging neural graph-algorithmic reasoning and contrastive self-supervised learning. Across eight low-data settings-including classical control, navigation and Atari-XLVINs provide significant improvements to data efficiency against value iteration-based implicit planners, as well as relevant model-free baselines. Lastly, we empirically verify that XLVINs can closely align with value iteration. * Work performed while the author was at DeepMind.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers11
- The CLRS Algorithmic Reasoning BenchmarkPetar Velickovic, Adrià Puigdomènech Badia, David Budden, Razvan Pascanu et al.ICML 2022 · 118 citations
- Graph Neural Networks are Dynamic ProgrammersAndrew Joseph Dudzik, Petar VelickovicNeurIPS 2022 · 82 citations
- Neural Algorithmic Reasoning with Causal RegularisationBeatrice Bevilacqua, Kyriacos Nikiforou, Borja Ibarz, Ioana Bica et al.ICML 2023 · 39 citations
- Neural Set Function Extensions: Learning with Discrete Functions in High DimensionsNikolaos Karalias, Joshua Robinson, Andreas Loukas, Stefanie JegelkaNeurIPS 2022 · 17 citations
- On the Markov Property of Neural Algorithmic Reasoning: Analyses and MethodsMontgomery Bohde, Meng Liu, Alexandra Saxton, Shuiwang JiICLR 2024 · 16 citations
Builds on7
- Model Based Reinforcement Learning for AtariLukasz Kaiser, Mohammad Babaeizadeh, Piotr Milos, Blazej Osinski et al.ICLR 2020 · 969 citations
- Planning to Explore via Self-Supervised World ModelsRamanan Sekar, Oleh Rybkin, Kostas Daniilidis, Pieter Abbeel et al.ICML 2020 · 489 citations
- Contrastive Learning of Structured World ModelsThomas N. Kipf, Elise van der Pol, Max WellingICLR 2020 · 322 citations
- Neural Execution of Graph AlgorithmsPetar Velickovic, Rex Ying, Matilde Padovano, Raia Hadsell et al.ICLR 2020 · 192 citations
- Discretizing Continuous Action Space for On-Policy OptimizationYunhao Tang, Shipra AgrawalAAAI 2020 · 150 citations
Related papers
- World Model as a Graph: Learning Latent Landmarks for PlanningLunjun Zhang, Ge Yang, Bradly C. StadieICML 2021 · 90 citations
- Latent Diffusion Planning for Imitation LearningAmber Xie, Oleh Rybkin, Dorsa Sadigh, Chelsea FinnICML 2025
- ViterbiPlanNet: Injecting Procedural Knowledge via Differentiable Viterbi for Planning in Instructional VideosLuigi Seminara, Davide Moltisanti, Antonino FurnariCVPR 2026 · 4 citations
- Simplified Temporal Consistency Reinforcement LearningYi Zhao, Wenshuai Zhao, Rinu Boney, Juho Kannala et al.ICML 2023 · 19 citations
- Understanding End-to-End Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Methods as Implicit ParameterizationClement Gehring, Kenji Kawaguchi, Jiaoyang Huang, Leslie Pack KaelblingNeurIPS 2021 · 6 citations
