SIMPLEMIX: Frustratingly Simple Mixing of Off- and On-policy Data in Language Model Preference Learning
Tianjian Li, Daniel Khashabi
Abstract
Aligning language models with human preferences relies on pairwise preference datasets. While some studies suggest that on-policy data consistently outperforms off -policy data for preference learning, others indicate that the advantages of on-policy data may be task-dependent, highlighting the need for a systematic exploration of their interplay. In this work, we show that on-policy and offpolicy data offer complementary strengths in preference optimization: on-policy data is particularly effective for reasoning tasks like math and coding, while off-policy data performs better on open-ended tasks such as creative writing and making personal recommendations. Guided by these findings, we introduce SIMPLEMIX, an approach to combine the complementary strengths of on-policy and off-policy preference learning by simply mixing these two data sources. Our empirical results across diverse tasks and benchmarks demonstrate that SIMPLEMIX substantially improves language model alignment. Specifically, SIMPLEMIX improves upon on-policy DPO and off-policy DPO by an average of 6.03% on Alpaca Eval 2.0. Moreover, it outperforms prior approaches that are much more complex in combining on-and off-policy data, such as HyPO and DPO-Mix-P, by an average of 3.05%.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4c0edb06-32fd-4bda-ad33-b0ebe2bc60b1Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on38
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
Related papers
- AutoMixAlign: Adaptive Data Mixing for Multi-Task Preference Optimization in LLMsNicholas E. Corrado, Julian Katz-Samuels, Adithya M. Devraj, Hyokun Yun et al.ACL 2025
- What Matters in Data for DPO?Yu Pan, Zhongze Cai, Huaiyang Zhong, Guanting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Towards Efficient Exact Optimization of Language Model AlignmentHaozhe Ji, Cheng Lu, Yilin Niu, Pei Ke et al.ICML 2024 · 32 citations
- Is On-Policy Data always the Best Choice for Direct Preference Optimization-Based LM Alignment?Zetian Sun, Dongfang Li, Xuhui Chen, Baotian Hu et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference OptimizationWenxuan Zhou, Ravi Agrawal, Shujian Zhang, Sathish Reddy Indurthi et al.EMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
