On Path to Multimodal Historical Reasoning: HistBench and HistAgent
Jiahao Qiu, Fulian Xiao, Yimin Wang, Yuchen Mao, Yijia Chen, Xinzhe Juan, Siran Wang, Xuan Qi, Tongcheng Zhang, Zixin Yao, Jiacheng Guo, Yifu Lu
Abstract
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have led to remarkable progress across various domains, yet their capabilities in the humanities, particularly history, remain underexplored. Historical reasoning poses unique challenges for LLMs, involving multimodal source interpretation, temporal inference, and cross-linguistic analysis. Existing general-purpose agents perform well on many current benchmarks but lack the domain expertise needed to address complex historical questions. To address this gap, we introduce HistBench, a new benchmark of 414 high-quality and carefully-reviewed questions stratified by difficulty and designed to evaluate LLM's capacity for historical reasoning. The tasks span a wide range of historical problems—from factual retrieval based on primary sources to interpretive analysis of manuscripts and images, to interdisciplinary challenges involving archaeology, linguistics, or cultural history. Furthermore, the benchmark dataset spans 29 ancient and modern languages and covers a wide range of historical periods and world regions. Finding the poor performance of LLMs and other agents on HistBench, we further present HistAgent, a history-specific agent equipped with carefully designed tools for OCR, translation, archival search, and image understanding in history. On HistBench, HistAgent based on GPT-4o achieves an accuracy of 28.50% pass@1 and 36.47% pass@2, significantly outperforming LLMs with online search and generalist agents, including GPT-4o (18.60%), DeepSeek-R1 (14.98%), Grok 3 (17.63%) and Open Deep Research by smolagents (19.57% pass@1 and 25.12% pass@2). These results highlight the limitations of existing LLMs and generalist agents and demonstrate the advantages of HistAgent for historical reasoning. Notably, HistAgent also achieves 60.00% pass@1 accuracy on the GAIA benchmark, showing that domain-specific customization doesn't hinder HistAgent's competitive performance on real-world general tasks. Code is available at https://github.com/CharlesQ9/HistAgent.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on5
- GAIA: a benchmark for General AI AssistantsGrégoire Mialon, Clémentine Fourrier, Thomas Wolf, Yann LeCun et al.ICLR 2024 · 716 citations
- SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language ModelsXiaoxuan Wang, Ziniu Hu, Pan Lu, Yanqiao Zhu et al.ICML 2024 · 220 citations
- OWL: Optimized Workforce Learning for General Multi-Agent Assistance in Real-World Task AutomationMengkang Hu, Yuhang Zhou, Wendong Fan, Yuzhou Nie et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 158 citations
- DS-Agent: Automated Data Science by Empowering Large Language Models with Case-Based ReasoningSiyuan Guo, Cheng Deng, Ying Wen, Hechang Chen et al.ICML 2024 · 107 citations
- Unveiling Challenges for LLMs in Enterprise Data EngineeringJan-Micha Bodensohn, Ulf Brackmann, Liane Vogel, Anupam Sanghi et al.VLDB 2026 · 13 citations
Related papers
- SPAN: Benchmarking and Improving Cross-Calendar Temporal Reasoning of Large Language ModelsZhongjian Miao, Hao Fu, Chen WeiAAAI 2026
- AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as AgentsXiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu et al.ICLR 2024 · 748 citations
- ACPBench: Reasoning About Action, Change, and PlanningHarsha Kokel, Michael Katz, Kavitha Srinivas, Shirin SohrabiAAAI 2025 · 35 citations
- ACADREASON: Exploring the Limits of Reasoning Models with Academic Research ProblemsXin Gui, King Zhu, JinCheng Ren, Qianben Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- 4D-Bench: Benchmarking Multi-Modal Large Language Models for 4D Object UnderstandingWenxuan Zhu, Bing Li, Cheng Zheng, Jinjie Mai et al.ICCV 2025 · 2 citations
