Deeper with Riemannian Geometry: Overcoming Oversmoothing and Oversquashing for Graph Foundation Models
Li Sun, Zhenhao Huang, Ming Zhang, Philip S. Yu
Abstract
Message Passing Neural Networks (MPNNs) is the building block of graph foundation models, but fundamentally suffer from oversmoothing and oversquashing. There has recently been a surge of interest in fixing both issues. Existing efforts primarily adopt global approaches, which may be beneficial in some regions but detrimental in others, ultimately leading to the suboptimal expressiveness. In this paper, we begin by revisiting oversquashing through a global measure -spectral gap λ -and prove that the increase of λ leads to gradient vanishing with respect to the input features, thereby undermining the effectiveness of message passing. Motivated by such theoretical insights, we propose a local approach that adaptively adjusts message passing based on local structures. To achieve this, we connect local Riemannian geometry with MPNNs, and establish a novel nonhomogeneous boundary condition to address both oversquashing and oversmoothing. Building on the Robin condition, we design a GBN network with local bottleneck adjustment, coupled with theoretical guarantees. Extensive experiments on homophilic and heterophilic graphs show the expressiveness of GBN. Furthermore, GBN does not exhibit performance degradation even when the network depth exceeds 256 layers. Recently, [47] demystifies how they affect the expressive power of MPNNs, while [3] develops a principled explanation via gradient vanishing, and bridges MPNNs and recurrent networks. 3 ⃝ Gating mechanism [8; 75; 76; 46] modulates gradient updates in the layers, and allows for different rates of message passing. 4 ⃝ Graph sparsification [11; 44] combats this issue from the structural perspective, given that some subgraphs, such as cliques, increase the risk of oversmoothing [39] . A theoretical review is provided in [31] . 5 ⃝ [32] presents a novel idea to transform the global spectral distribution in each layer of MPNN, while we focus on local adjustment of MPNN via boundary conditions. Different from designing additional modules or structural refinement, we focus on refining MPNN mechanism, not susceptible to oversmoothing. Oversquashing. 1 ⃝ It strongly depends on the graph structure, and thus a natural solution is graph rewriting, which typically adds edges to enlarge the topological bottlenecks, guided by Ricci curvature [64; 2; 18] or spectral analysis [30] . Also, graph transformers can be regarded as their generic form with learnable attentional weights [70; 21; 49]. [7] understands graph rewriting from the lens of effective resistance. Recently, it has been shown that incorporating virtual nodes is effective [45; 50]. [23] provides the theoretical aspects of oversquashing on depth, width, and topology of graphs. 2 ⃝ Recent studies jointly address oversmoothing via global treatments. In the line of graph rewriting, [39; 38; 20] introduce edge addition-deletion algorithms in light of oversmoothing; [28] increases the spectral gap via edge deletion; [4] conducts the feature rewriting with Delaunay triangulation. Recently, [27] considers the polynomial bases for the graph Fourier transform, while [42] designs an auxiliary module to prevent heterophily mixing. To combat over-squashing, [16] presents a novel approach to select nodes with high centrality to expand in width to encapsulate the growing influx of signals from distant nodes. In contrast to the previous global treatments, we introduce the local adjustment to message-passing paradigm with nonhomogeneous boundary conditions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers8
- Multi-Domain Riemannian Graph Gluing for Building Graph Foundation ModelsLi Sun, Zhenhao Huang, Silei Chen, Lanxu Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Heterophily-Agnostic Hypergraph Neural Networks with Riemannian Local ExchangerLi Sun, Ming Zhang, Wenxin Jin, Zhongtian Sun et al.WWW 2026 · 1 citation
- Riemannian Graph Tokenizer for Structural Knowledge TransferQimin Zhou, Haibo Liu, Yujie Wang, Li Sun et al.WWW 2026
- Hyperbolic Continuous Structural Entropy for Hierarchical ClusteringGuangjie Zeng, Hao Peng, Angsheng Li, Li Sun et al.AAAI 2026
- Source-Free Graph Foundation Model Adaptation via Pseudo-Source ReconstructionLiang Yang, Hui Ning, Jiaming Zhuo, Ziyi Ma et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on43
- Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional NetworksMing Chen, Zhewei Wei, Zengfeng Huang, Bolin Ding et al.ICML 2020 · 1,910 citations
- Measuring and Relieving the Over-Smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological ViewDeli Chen, Yankai Lin, Wei Li, Peng Li et al.AAAI 2020 · 1,353 citations
- Graph Neural Networks Exponentially Lose Expressive Power for Node ClassificationKenta Oono, Taiji SuzukiICLR 2020 · 864 citations
- Understanding over-squashing and bottlenecks on graphs via curvatureJake Topping, Francesco Di Giovanni, Benjamin Paul Chamberlain, Xiaowen Dong et al.ICLR 2022 · 628 citations
- Towards Deeper Graph Neural NetworksMeng Liu, Hongyang Gao, Shuiwang JiKDD 2020 · 496 citations
Related papers
- On Over-Squashing in Message Passing Neural Networks: The Impact of Width, Depth, and TopologyFrancesco Di Giovanni, Lorenzo Giusti, Federico Barbero, Giulia Luise et al.ICML 2023 · 190 citations
- Spectral Graph Pruning Against Over-Squashing and Over-SmoothingAdarsh Jamadandi, Celia Rubio-Madrigal, Rebekka BurkholzNeurIPS 2024 · 33 citations
- Understanding Oversquashing in GNNs through the Lens of Effective ResistanceMitchell Black, Zhengchao Wan, Amir Nayyeri, Yusu WangICML 2023 · 116 citations
- Locality-Aware Graph Rewiring in GNNsFederico Barbero, Ameya Velingker, Amin Saberi, Michael M. Bronstein et al.ICLR 2024 · 64 citations
- Understanding Virtual Nodes: Oversquashing and Node HeterogeneityJoshua Southern, Francesco Di Giovanni, Michael M. Bronstein, Johannes F. LutzeyerICLR 2025
