AANG : Automating Auxiliary Learning
Lucio M. Dery, Paul Michel, Mikhail Khodak, Graham Neubig, Ameet Talwalkar
Abstract
Auxiliary objectives, supplementary learning signals that are introduced to help aid learning on data-starved or highly complex end-tasks, are commonplace in machine learning. Whilst much work has been done to formulate useful auxiliary objectives, their construction is still an art which proceeds by slow and tedious handdesign. Intuition for how and when these objectives improve end-task performance has also had limited theoretical backing. In this work, we present an approach for automatically generating a suite of auxiliary objectives. We achieve this by deconstructing existing objectives within a novel unified taxonomy, identifying connections between them, and generating new ones based on the uncovered structure. Next, we theoretically formalize widely-held intuitions about how auxiliary learning improves generalization on the end-task. This leads us to a principled and efficient algorithm for searching the space of generated objectives to find those most useful to a specified end-task. With natural language processing (NLP) as our domain of study, we demonstrate that our automated auxiliary learning pipeline leads to strong improvements over competitive baselines across continued training experiments on a pre-trained model on 5 NLP tasks 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4a838d3f-dc77-42d3-b60a-9f8dc607fde4Cited by top-tier papers3
- ForkMerge: Mitigating Negative Transfer in Auxiliary-Task LearningJunguang Jiang, Baixu Chen, Junwei Pan, Ximei Wang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 55 citations
- Improving Few-Shot Generalization by Exploring and Exploiting Auxiliary DataAlon Albalak, Colin A. Raffel, William Yang WangNeurIPS 2023 · 17 citations
- Aux-NAS: Exploiting Auxiliary Labels with Negligibly Extra Inference CostYuan Gao, Weizhong Zhang, Wenhan Luo, Lin Ma et al.ICLR 2024 · 1 citation
Builds on13
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Bootstrap Your Own Latent - A New Approach to Self-Supervised LearningJean-Bastien Grill, Florian Strub, Florent Altché, Corentin Tallec et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 9,171 citations
- Searching for MobileNetV3Andrew Howard, Ruoming Pang, Hartwig Adam, Quoc V. Le et al.ICCV 2019 · 9,163 citations
- An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian InferenceSang Michael Xie, Aditi Raghunathan, Percy Liang, Tengyu MaICLR 2022 · 1,030 citations
Related papers
- Automatic Auxiliary Task Selection and Adaptive Weighting Boost Molecular Property PredictionZhiqiang Zhong, Davide MottinNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Auxiliary Learning by Implicit DifferentiationAviv Navon, Idan Achituve, Haggai Maron, Gal Chechik et al.ICLR 2021 · 72 citations
- Joint Data-Task Generation for Auxiliary LearningHong Chen, Xin Wang, Yuwei Zhou, Yijian Qin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
- EAGER: Asking and Answering Questions for Automatic Reward Shaping in Language-guided RLThomas Carta, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer, Olivier Sigaud, Sylvain LamprierNeurIPS 2022 · 35 citations
- Should We Be Pre-training? An Argument for End-task Aware Training as an AlternativeLucio M. Dery, Paul Michel, Ameet Talwalkar, Graham NeubigICLR 2022 · 39 citations
