Mitigating the Impact of False Negative in Dense Retrieval with Contrastive Confidence Regularization
Shiqi Wang, Yeqin Zhang, Cam-Tu Nguyen
Abstract
In open-domain Question Answering (QA), dense retrieval is crucial for finding relevant passages for answer generation. Typically, contrastive learning is used to train a retrieval model that maps passages and queries to the same semantic space. The objective is to make similar ones closer and dissimilar ones further apart. However, training such a system is challenging due to the false negative issue, where relevant passages may be missed during data annotation. Hard negative sampling, which is commonly used to improve contrastive learning, can introduce more noise in training. This is because hard negatives are those closer to a given query, and thus more likely to be false negatives. To address this issue, we propose a novel contrastive confidence regularizer for Noise Contrastive Estimation (NCE) loss, a commonly used loss for dense retrieval. Our analysis shows that the regularizer helps dense retrieval models be more robust against false negatives with a theoretical guarantee. Additionally, we propose a model-agnostic method to filter out noisy negative passages in the dataset, improving any downstream dense retrieval models. Through experiments on three datasets, we demonstrate that our method achieves better retrieval performance in comparison to existing state-of-the-art dense retrieval systems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4a4cbc84-e82a-44c2-b4ef-900c09a8d351Cited by top-tier papers4
- SPACE: Noise Contrastive Estimation Stabilizes Self-Play Fine-Tuning for Large Language ModelsYibo Wang, Guangda Huzhang, Qingguo Chen, Zhao Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Cooperative Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Question Answering: Mutual Information Exchange and Ranking by Contrasting LayersYoumin Ko, Sungjong Seo, Hyunjoon KimNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- ARHN: Answer-Centric Relabeling of Hard Negatives with Open-Source LLMs for Dense RetrievalHyewon Choi, Jooyoung Choi, Hansol Jang, Hyun Kim et al.SIGIR 2026
- Must All Negatives Be Pushed Away Equally? Uncertainty-Aware Cross-View Geo-Localization via Normal Inverse Gamma DistributionSongsong Ouyang, Le Wu, Yingying ZhuICML 2026
Builds on24
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Retrieval Augmented Language Model Pre-TrainingKelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat et al.ICML 2020 · 2,937 citations
- Improving Language Models by Retrieving from Trillions of TokensSebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Jordan Hoffmann, Trevor Cai et al.ICML 2022 · 1,629 citations
- Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text RetrievalLee Xiong, Chenyan Xiong, Ye Li, Kwok-Fung Tang et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,547 citations
- ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTOmar Khattab, Matei ZahariaSIGIR 2020 · 1,246 citations
Related papers
- Sentence-aware Contrastive Learning for Open-Domain Passage RetrievalWu Hong, Zhuosheng Zhang, Jinyuan Wang, Hai ZhaoACL 2022
- xMoCo: Cross Momentum Contrastive Learning for Open-Domain Question AnsweringNan Yang, Furu Wei, Binxing Jiao, Daxing Jiang et al.ACL 2021
- Multi-stage Training with Improved Negative Contrast for Neural Passage RetrievalJing Lu, Gustavo Hernández Ábrego, Ji Ma, Jianmo Ni et al.EMNLP 2021 · 21 citations
- Query-as-context Pre-training for Dense Passage RetrievalXing Wu, Guangyuan Ma, Wanhui Qian, Zijia Lin et al.EMNLP 2023 · 2 citations
- Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question AnsweringVladimir Karpukhin, Barlas Oguz, Sewon Min, Patrick Lewis et al.EMNLP 2020 · 142 citations
