Same Same, But Different: Conditional Multi-Task Learning for Demographic-Specific Toxicity Detection
Soumyajit Gupta, Sooyong Lee, Maria De-Arteaga, Matthew Lease
Abstract
Algorithmic bias often arises as a result of differential subgroup validity, in which predictive relationships vary across groups. For example, in toxic language detection, comments targeting different demographic groups can vary markedly across groups. In such settings, trained models can be dominated by the relationships that best fit the majority group, leading to disparate performance. We propose framing toxicity detection as multi-task learning (MTL), allowing a model to specialize on the relationships that are relevant to each demographic group while also leveraging shared properties across groups. With toxicity detection, each task corresponds to identifying toxicity against a particular demographic group. However, traditional MTL requires labels for all tasks to be present for every data point. To address this, we propose Conditional MTL (CondMTL), wherein only training examples relevant to the given demographic group are considered by the loss function. This lets us learn group specific representations in each branch which are not cross contaminated by irrelevant labels. Results on synthetic and real data show that using CondMTL improves predictive recall over various baselines in general and for the minority demographic group in particular, while having similar overall accuracy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Human-centered NLP Fact-checking: Co-Designing with Fact-checkers using Matchmaking for AIHoujiang Liu, Anubrata Das, Alexander Boltz, Didi Zhou et al.CSCW 2024 · 23 citations
- Hate Speech Detection with Generalizable Target-aware FairnessTong Chen, Danny Wang, Xurong Liang, Marten Risius et al.KDD 2024 · 7 citations
- Voices in a Crowd: Searching for clusters of unique perspectivesNikolas Vitsakis, Amit Parekh, Ioannis KonstasEMNLP 2024
Builds on6
- WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsPang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie et al.ICML 2021 · 1,773 citations
- FairBatch: Batch Selection for Model FairnessYuji Roh, Kangwook Lee, Steven Euijong Whang, Changho SuhICLR 2021 · 156 citations
- Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning ModelsMitchell L. Gordon, Michelle S. Lam, Joon Sung Park, Kayur Patel et al.CHI 2022 · 134 citations
- Many Task Learning With Task RoutingGjorgji Strezoski, Nanne van Noord, Marcel WorringICCV 2019 · 112 citations
- Fragile Masculinity: Men, Gender, and Online HarassmentJennifer D. Rubin, Lindsay Blackwell, Terri D. ConleyCHI 2020 · 40 citations
Related papers
- Bias Mitigation for Toxicity Detection via Sequential DecisionsLu Cheng, Ahmadreza Mosallanezhad, Yasin N. Silva, Deborah L. Hall et al.SIGIR 2022 · 8 citations
- Learning Subjective Label Distributions via Sociocultural DescriptorsMohammed Fayiz Parappan, Ricardo HenaoEMNLP 2025 · 5 citations
- Conditional Learning of Fair RepresentationsHan Zhao, Amanda Coston, Tameem Adel, Geoffrey J. GordonICLR 2020 · 127 citations
- Exploiting MMD and Sinkhorn Divergences for Fair and Transferable Representation LearningLuca Oneto, Michele Donini, Giulia Luise, Carlo Ciliberto et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 56 citations
- Multi-Task Representation Alignment on Language Understanding: A Mutual Information PerspectiveDou Hu, Lingwei Wei, Hongjiang Xiao, Songlin Hu et al.ACL 2026
