µAkka: Mutation Testing for Actor Concurrency in Akka using Real-World Bugs
Mohsen Moradi-Moghadam, Mehdi Bagherzadeh, Raffi Khatchadourian, Hamid Bagheri
Abstract
Actor concurrency is becoming increasingly important in the realworld and mission-critical software. This requires these applications to be free from actor bugs, that occur in the real world, and have tests that are effective in finding these bugs. Mutation testing is a well-established technique that transforms an application to induce its likely bugs and evaluate the effectiveness of its tests in finding these bugs. Mutation testing is available for a broad spectrum of applications and their bugs, ranging from web to mobile to machine learning, and is used at scale in companies like Google and Facebook. However, there still is no mutation testing for actor concurrency that uses real-world actor bugs. In this paper, we propose 𝜇Akka, a framework for mutation testing of Akka actor concurrency using real actor bugs. Akka is a popular industrial-strength implementation of actor concurrency. To design, implement, and evaluate 𝜇Akka, we take the following major steps: ( 1) manually analyze a recent set of 186 real Akka bugs from Stack Overflow and GitHub to understand their causes; (2) design a set of 32 mutation operators, with 138 source code changes in Akka API, to emulate these causes and induce their bugs; (3) implement these operators in an Eclipse plugin for Java Akka; (4) use the plugin to generate 11.7k mutants of 10 real GitHub applications, with 446.4k lines of code and 7.9k tests; (5) run these tests on these mutants to measure the quality of mutants and effectiveness of tests; (6) use PIT to generate 26.2k mutants to compare 𝜇Akka and PIT mutant quality and test effectiveness. PIT is a popular mutation testing tool with traditional operators; ( 7) manually analyze the bug coverage and overlap of 𝜇Akka, PIT, and actor operators in a previous work; and (8) discuss a few implications of our findings. Among others, we find that 𝜇Akka mutants are higher quality, cover more bugs, and tests are less effective in detecting them.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- DeepCrime: mutation testing of deep learning systems based on real faultsNargiz Humbatova, Gunel Jahangirova, Paolo TonellaISSTA 2021 · 114 citations
- An Empirical Study of Refactorings and Technical Debt in Machine Learning SystemsYiming Tang, Raffi Khatchadourian, Mehdi Bagherzadeh, Rhia Singh et al.ICSE 2021 · 60 citations
- Prioritizing Mutants to Guide Mutation TestingSamuel J. Kaufman, Ryan Featherman, Justin Alvin, Bob Kurtz et al.ICSE 2022 · 36 citations
- Actor concurrency bugs: a comprehensive study on symptoms, root causes, API usages, and differencesMehdi Bagherzadeh, Nicholas Fireman, Anas Shawesh, Raffi KhatchadourianOOPSLA 2020 · 13 citations
Related papers
- Transforming Test Suites into CroissantsYang Chen, Alperen Yildiz, Darko Marinov, Reyhaneh JabbarvandISSTA 2023 · 5 citations
- Mantra: Mutation Testing of Hardware Design Code Based on Real BugsJiang Wu, Yan Lei, Zhuo Zhang, Xiankai Meng et al.DAC 2023 · 7 citations
- Does mutation testing improve testing practices?Goran Petrovic, Marko Ivankovic, Gordon Fraser, René JustICSE 2021 · 6 citations
- Ma11y: A Mutation Framework for Web Accessibility TestingMahan Tafreshipour, Anmol Vilas Deshpande, Forough Mehralian, Iftekhar Ahmed et al.ISSTA 2024 · 5 citations
- Natural Test Generation for Precise Testing of Question Answering SoftwareQingchao Shen, Junjie Chen, Jie M. Zhang, Haoyu Wang et al.ASE 2022 · 27 citations
