Inductive Learning of Logical Theories with LLMs: A Expressivity-graded Analysis
João Pedro Gandarela de Souza, Danilo S. Carvalho, André Freitas
Abstract
This work presents a novel systematic methodology to analyse the capabilities and limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) with feedback from a formal inference engine, on logic theory induction. The analysis is complexity-graded w.r.t. rule dependency structure, allowing quantification of specific inference challenges on LLM performance. Integrating LLMs with formal methods is a promising frontier in the Natural Language Processing field, as an important avenue for improving model inference control and explainability. In particular, inductive learning over complex sets of facts and rules, poses unique challenges for current autoregressive models, as they lack explicit symbolic grounding. While they can be complemented by formal systems, the properties delivered by LLMs regarding inductive learning, are not well understood and quantified. Empirical results indicate that the largest LLMs can achieve competitive results against a SOTA Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) system baseline, but also that tracking long predicate relationship chains is a more difficult obstacle than theory complexity for LLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4973a17a-6c6b-4b73-9dc2-26e4b89b8a99Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on5
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on CompositionalityNouha Dziri, Ximing Lu, Melanie Sclar, Xiang Lorraine Li et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 728 citations
- NuWLS: Improving Local Search for (Weighted) Partial MaxSAT by New Weighting TechniquesYi Chu, Shaowei Cai, Chuan LuoAAAI 2023 · 33 citations
- Verification and Refinement of Natural Language Explanations through LLM-Symbolic Theorem ProvingXin Quan, Marco Valentino, Louise A. Dennis, André FreitasEMNLP 2024 · 9 citations
Related papers
- Do Large Language Models excel in Complex Logical Reasoning with Formal Language?Jin Jiang, Jianing Wang, Yuchen Yan, Yang Liu et al.EMNLP 2025 · 3 citations
- Do LLMs Really Struggle at NL-FOL Translation? Revealing Their Strengths via a Novel Benchmarking StrategyAndrea Brunello, Luca Geatti, Michele Mignani, Angelo Montanari et al.AAAI 2026
- Can LLMs Reason with Rules? Logic Scaffolding for Stress-Testing and Improving LLMsSiyuan Wang, Zhongyu Wei, Yejin Choi, Xiang RenACL 2024
- InductionBench: LLMs Fail in the Simplest Complexity ClassWenyue Hua, Tyler Wong, Fei Sun, Liangming Pan et al.ACL 2025
- SATBench: Benchmarking LLMs' Logical Reasoning via Automated Puzzle Generation from SAT FormulasAnjiang Wei, Yuheng Wu, Yingjia Wan, Tarun Suresh et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
