Alleviating Hallucinations from Knowledge Misalignment in Large Language Models via Selective Abstention Learning
Lei Huang, Xiaocheng Feng, Weitao Ma, Yuchun Fan, Xiachong Feng, Yuxuan Gu, Yangfan Ye, Liang Zhao, Weihong Zhong, Baoxin Wang, Dayong Wu, Guoping Hu
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are known to suffer from severe hallucination issues. One of the main causes lies in the knowledge misalignment between the pre-training stage and the supervised fine-tuning stage. The unfamiliar knowledge encountered during fine-tuning may encourage LLMs to generate facts that are not grounded in parametric knowledge. To address this, we propose SEAL 1 , a novel training objective with an abstention mechanism, in which the model learns to selectively reject tokens that misalign with the desired knowledge distribution via a special [REJ] token. This allows the model to have the alternative of acknowledging the insufficiency of knowledge rather than blindly assigning high probability to all groundtruth answers. We further propose a regularized decoding objective that penalizes uncertain predictions during inference by using the [REJ] probability learned during training. Extensive experiments on six short-form and long-form QA datasets with three LLMs of different sizes demonstrate that our method effectively alleviates hallucinations caused by knowledge misalignment. Further analysis highlights the adaptations of our method in answer refusal scenarios and its ability to effectively maintain the model's instruction-following capabilities.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 491a3afc-9bf3-4b18-9fa7-00f8655e53c1Cited by top-tier papers3
- Two Pathways to Truthfulness: On the Intrinsic Encoding of LLM HallucinationsWen Luo, Guangyue Peng, Wei Li, Shaohang Wei et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- LANG: Reinforcement Learning for Multilingual Reasoning with Language-Adaptive Hint GuidanceYuchun Fan, Bei Li, Peiguang Li, Yilin Wang et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Hallucination is a Consequence of Space-Optimality: A Rate-Distortion Theorem for Membership TestingAnxin Guo, Jingwei LiICML 2026
Builds on17
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-ReflectionAkari Asai, Zeqiu Wu, Yizhong Wang, Avirup Sil et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,798 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
- WizardLM: Empowering Large Pre-Trained Language Models to Follow Complex InstructionsCan Xu, Qingfeng Sun, Kai Zheng, Xiubo Geng et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,206 citations
- Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentionWoosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng et al.SOSP 2023 · 1,016 citations
Related papers
- Do Retrieval Augmented Language Models Know When They Don't Know?Youchao Zhou, Heyan Huang, Yicheng Liu, Rui Dai et al.AAAI 2026
- Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?Zorik Gekhman, Gal Yona, Roee Aharoni, Matan Eyal et al.EMNLP 2024 · 53 citations
- FLAME : Factuality-Aware Alignment for Large Language ModelsSheng-Chieh Lin, Luyu Gao, Barlas Oguz, Wenhan Xiong et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 63 citations
- Answering the Wrong Question: Reasoning Trace Inversion for Abstention in LLMsAbinitha Gourabathina, Inkit Padhi, Manish Nagireddy, Subhajit Chaudhury et al.ACL 2026
- Fictitious Synthetic Data Can Improve LLM Factuality via Prerequisite LearningYujian Liu, Shiyu Chang, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Yang ZhangICLR 2025
