Asymmetric Grid Quorum Systems for Heterogeneous Processes
Michael Senn, Christian Cachin
Abstract
Quorum systems are a common way to formalize failure assumptions in distributed systems. Traditionally, these assumptions are shared by all involved processes. More recently, systems have emerged which allow processes some freedom in choosing their own, subjective or asymmetric, failure assumptions. For such a system to work, individual processes' assumptions must be compatible. However, this leads to a Catch-22-style scenario: How can processes collaborate to agree on compatible failure assumptions when they have no compatible failure assumptions to start with? We introduce asymmetric grid quorum systems that allow a group of processes to specify heterogeneous trust assumptions independently of each other and without coordination. They are based on qualitative attributes describing how the processes differ. Each process may select a quorum system from this class that aligns best with its subjective view. The available choices are designed to be compatible by definition, thereby breaking the cycling dependency. Asymmetric grid quorum systems have many applications that range from cloud platforms to blockchain networks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 48e3d566-860e-4e3f-b085-0899189ad57bBuilds on2
Related papers
- Flock: A Framework for Deploying On-Demand Distributed TrustDarya Kaviani, Sijun Tan, Pravein Govindan Kannan, Raluca Ada PopaOSDI 2024 · 5 citations
- RunTime-assisted convergence in replicated data typesGowtham Kaki, Prasanth Prahladan, Nicholas V. LewchenkoPLDI 2022 · 3 citations
- Flexible Advancement in Asynchronous BFT ConsensusShengyun Liu, Wenbo Xu, Chen Shan, Xiaofeng Yan et al.SOSP 2023 · 19 citations
- Sublinear-Round Broadcast without Trusted SetupAndreea B. Alexandru, Julian Loss, Charalampos Papamanthou, Giorgos Tsimos et al.SODA 2025 · 1 citation
- Predicting Failures in Smart Human-Centric EcosystemsNiccolò Puccinelli, Davide Molinelli, Noura El Moussa, Matteo Ciniselli et al.ICSE 2026
