EMNLP Findings2025
HiMATE: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework for Machine Translation Evaluation
Shijie Zhang, Renhao Li, Songsheng Wang, Philipp Koehn, Min Yang, Derek F. Wong
Abstract
The advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) enables flexible and interpretable automatic evaluations. In the field of machine translation evaluation, utilizing LLMs with translation error annotations based on Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM) yields more human-aligned judgments. However, current LLM-based evaluation methods still face challenges in accurately identifying error spans and assessing their severity. In this paper, we propose HiMATE, a Hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework for Machine Translation Evaluation. We argue that existing approaches inadequately exploit the fine-grained structural and semantic information within the MQM hierarchy. To address this, we develop a hierarchical multi-agent system grounded in the MQM error typology, enabling granular evaluation of subtype errors. Two key strategies are incorporated to further mitigate systemic hallucinations within the framework: the utilization of the model's self-reflection capability and the facilitation of agent discussion involving asymmetric information. Empirically, HiMATE outperforms competitive baselines across different datasets in conducting humanaligned evaluations. Further analyses underscore its significant advantage in error span detection and severity assessment, achieving an average F1-score improvement of 89% over the best-performing baseline. We make our code and data publicly available at https: //github.com/nlp2ct-shijie/HiMATE.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 1 top-tier paper that cites it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Builds on9
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text GenerationWeizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, Pengfei LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,143 citations
- ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent DebateChi-Min Chan, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Jianxuan Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 871 citations
- Error Analysis Prompting Enables Human-Like Translation Evaluation in Large Language ModelsQingyu Lu, Baopu Qiu, Liang Ding, Kanjian Zhang et al.ACL Findings 2024 · 32 citations
- Toward Human-Like Evaluation for Natural Language Generation with Error AnalysisQingyu Lu, Liang Ding, Liping Xie, Kanjian Zhang et al.ACL 2023 · 10 citations
Related papers
- M-MAD: Multidimensional Multi-Agent Debate for Advanced Machine Translation EvaluationZhaopeng Feng, Jiayuan Su, Jiamei Zheng, Jiahan Ren et al.ACL 2025
- Enhancing Human Evaluation in Machine Translation with Comparative JudgementYixiao Song, Parker Riley, Daniel Deutsch, Markus FreitagACL 2025 · 2 citations
- LQM: Linguistically Motivated Multidimensional Quality Metrics for Machine TranslationSamar Mohamed Magdy, Fakhraddin Alwajih, Abdellah El Mekki, Wesam El-Sayed et al.ACL Findings 2026 · 2 citations
- Beyond Correlation: Interpretable Evaluation of Machine Translation MetricsStefano Perrella, Lorenzo Proietti, Pere-Lluís Huguet Cabot, Edoardo Barba et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Quantifying the Impact of Translation Errors on Multilingual LLM EvaluationKlaudia Thellmann, Bernhard Stadler, Michael Färber, Jens LehmannACL 2026
