Interest-Shift-Aware Logical Reasoning for Efficient Long-Sequence Recommendation
Fei Li, Qingyun Gao, Enneng Yang, Jianzhe Zhao, Guibing Guo
Abstract
Logical reasoning-based recommendation methods formulate logical expressions to characterize user-item interaction patterns, incorporating regularization constraints to ensure consistency with logical rules. However, these methods face two critical challenges: (1) As sequence length increases, they cannot effectively capture the dynamic transfer of user interests across subsequences (i.e., subsequence interest drift), thereby degenerating logical expressions to single-subsequence inference. (2) The time complexity of logical reasoning and rule learning scales quadratically with the sequence length, severely constraining computational efficiency in long-sequence recommendation. To address these challenges, we propose ELECTOR, an intErest-shift-aware long-sequence Logical reasoning for EffiCienT lOng-sequence Recommendation method. Specifically, we design a Subsequence Interest Learning Module (SIL) to model cross-subsequence interest drifts in long sequences. SIL employs a local attention mechanism to extract subsequence interests effectively and a global attention mechanism to capture the correlations among subsequence interests. Subsequently, we propose an Interest-aware Logical Reasoning (ILR) mechanism that performs logical reasoning using a limited set of subsequence and short-term interests, rather than reasoning over the entire sequence, significantly reducing time complexity. Additionally, ILR employs interest logical reasoning contrastive loss to ensure the model simultaneously considers multiple interests. Experiments on four real-world datasets demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms all baselines regarding computational efficiency and recommendation accuracy, confirming its effectiveness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on9
- Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear AttentionAngelos Katharopoulos, Apoorv Vyas, Nikolaos Pappas, François FleuretICML 2020 · 2,665 citations
- Transformers are SSMs: Generalized Models and Efficient Algorithms Through Structured State Space DualityTri Dao, Albert GuICML 2024 · 1,407 citations
- Neural Collaborative ReasoningHanxiong Chen, Shaoyun Shi, Yunqi Li, Yongfeng ZhangWWW 2021 · 100 citations
- LinRec: Linear Attention Mechanism for Long-term Sequential Recommender SystemsLangming Liu, Liu Cai, Chi Zhang, Xiangyu Zhao et al.SIGIR 2023 · 86 citations
- Neuro-Symbolic Interpretable Collaborative Filtering for Attribute-based RecommendationWei Zhang, Junbing Yan, Zhuo Wang, Jianyong WangWWW 2022 · 36 citations
Related papers
- Denoising Multi-Interest-Aware Logical Reasoning for Long-Sequence RecommendationFei Li, Qingyun Gao, Yizhou Dang, Enneng Yang et al.SIGIR 2025
- Iterative Sparse Attention for Long-sequence RecommendationGuanyu Lin, Jinwei Luo, Yinfeng Li, Chen Gao et al.AAAI 2025 · 2 citations
- Lifelong Sequential Recommendation with Adaptive Subsequence Compression and Contextual FusionFei Li, Xiaoming Liu, Jiayi Luo, Guibing Guo et al.WWW 2026
- Disentangling Long and Short-Term Interests for RecommendationYu Zheng, Chen Gao, Jianxin Chang, Yanan Niu et al.WWW 2022 · 128 citations
- FuXi-Linear: Unleashing the Power of Linear Attention in Long-term Time-aware Sequential RecommendationYufei Ye, Wei Guo, Hao Wang, Luankang Zhang et al.KDD 2026 · 8 citations
