Addressing and Visualizing Misalignments in Human Task-Solving Trajectories
Sejin Kim, Hosung Lee, Sundong Kim
Abstract
Understanding misalignments in human task-solving trajectories is crucial for enhancing AI models trained to closely mimic human reasoning. This study categorizes such misalignments into three types: (1) lack of functions to express intent, (2) inefficient action sequences, and (3) incorrect intentions that cannot solve the task. To address these issues, we first formalize and define these three misalignment types in a unified framework. We then propose a heuristic algorithm to detect misalignments in ARCTraj trajectories and analyze their impact hierarchically and quantitatively. We also present an intention estimation method based on our formalism that infers missing alignment between user actions and intentions. Through trajectory alignment, we experimentally demonstrate that AI models trained on human task-solving trajectories improve performance in mimicking human reasoning. Based on hierarchical analysis and experiments, we highlight the importance of trajectory-intention alignment and demonstrate the effectiveness of intention-aligned training. CCS Concepts • Computing methodologies → Probabilistic reasoning; Planning with abstraction and generalization; Learning from demonstrations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 486bf488-364b-4188-acc5-923f52e364c2Related papers
- Expectation Alignment: Handling Reward Misspecification in the Presence of Expectation MismatchMalek Mechergui, Sarath SreedharanNeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- Joint Reward and Policy Learning with Demonstrations and Human Feedback Improves AlignmentChenliang Li, Siliang Zeng, Zeyi Liao, Jiaxiang Li et al.ICLR 2025
- Can Language Models Learn to Skip Steps?Tengxiao Liu, Qipeng Guo, Xiangkun Hu, Cheng Jiayang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 92 citations
- What Can Neural Networks Reason About?Keyulu Xu, Jingling Li, Mozhi Zhang, Simon S. Du et al.ICLR 2020 · 281 citations
- From Heuristic to Analytic: Cognitively Motivated Strategies for Coherent Physical Commonsense ReasoningZheyuan Zhang, Shane Storks, Fengyuan Hu, Sungryull Sohn et al.EMNLP 2023
