Distilling Causal Signals for One-Shot Directed Evolution of Antibodies
Sai Pooja Mahajan, Natasa Tagasovska, Stefania Vasilaki, Arian R. Jamasb, Andrew M. Watkins, Rajesh Ranganath
Abstract
Improving antibody binding to an antigen without antibody-antigen complex structures or antigen-specific training data is a central challenge in therapeutic protein design. We introduce AFFINITYENHANCER, a framework for one-shot antibody affinity improvement with strong generalization: given a single lead sequence, we propose variants that increase affinity without fine-tuning on the lead and without using antigen information, epitope/paratope labels, or the lead's structure in complex with the antigen. During training, AFFINITYENHANCER leverages a panantigen dataset of diverse binding environments (antigens) and constructs paired examples of related sequences with higher vs. lower measured binding. A shared, structure-aware module learns to transform low-affinity sequences toward highaffinity ones, distilling consistent, causal features associated with improved binding across environments. By combining pretrained sequence-structure embeddings with a sequence decoder, AFFINITYENHANCER generalizes to entirely unseen antibody seeds. Across multiple held-out internal and public leads, AFFINITYEN-HANCER concentrates mutations on the rim of the paratope, outperforms existing structure-conditioned and inpainting baselines, and achieves substantial in silico affinity gains in true one-shot experiments, despite never observing antigen-specific data at test time.[ https://github.com/prescient-design/AffinityEnhancer ] Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2026 250 residues). As a consequence, the resulting sets of designs can be suboptimal and fail to identify sufficient number of antibodies with the desired potency and drug-like properties. Figure 1 : One-shot affinity maturation of antibodies with AFFINITYENHANCER. A) The goal is to implicitly learn modes of affinity maturation by pairing a lower affinity antibody with a higher affinity one. B) Matched datasets are obtained by pairing antibodies against the same target/antigen from the SKEMPI 2.0 database. C) Architecture for AFFINITYENHANCER. D) Inference and validation pipeline for held-out-seed to determine whether sampled sequences are binders or not. Computational affinity maturation with machine learning offers an accelerated alternative to random or directed mutagenesis. However, the one-shot setting-where a model must propose improved variants from a single lead sequence without antigen context or fine-tuning-poses a key generalization challenge: the lead may be far from the training distribution in sequence and structural features. This challenge is compounded by the limited availability and diversity of paired antibody-antigen structures and affinity measurements, which impedes robust transfer to unseen targets (Hummer et al., 2023) . To bypass the challenges associated with explicitly modeling affinity, Tagasovska et al. (2024) proposed Property Enhancer (PropEn), a property-agnostic model which utilizes data matching to implicitly learn the direction of the gradient for a property of interest with the goal of proposing new optimized designs. It was previously demonstrated that this approach works for a range of tasks, including affinity maturation of antibodies. However, its effectiveness was only demonstrated in sequence-based models and in cases where a few hundred sequences related to the lead molecule we wish to optimize are already available in the training data, hence, not suitable to one-shot scenarios. In this work, we propose AFFINITYENHANCER, a model that goes beyond the PropEn framework, namely to the one-shot affinity maturation setup by leveraging structure information and introducing
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on8
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Protein Design with Guided Discrete DiffusionNate Gruver, Samuel Stanton, Nathan C. Frey, Tim G. J. Rudner et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 246 citations
- Protein Discovery with Discrete Walk-Jump SamplingNathan C. Frey, Daniel Berenberg, Karina Zadorozhny, Joseph Kleinhenz et al.ICLR 2024 · 54 citations
- Antigen-Specific Antibody Design via Direct Energy-based Preference OptimizationXiangxin Zhou, Dongyu Xue, Ruizhe Chen, Zaixiang Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 48 citations
- Protein Representation Learning by Geometric Structure PretrainingZuobai Zhang, Minghao Xu, Arian Rokkum Jamasb, Vijil Chenthamarakshan et al.ICLR 2023 · 40 citations
Related papers
- AffinityFlow: Guided Flows for Antibody Affinity MaturationCan Chen, Karla-Luise Herpoldt, Chenchao Zhao, Zichen Wang et al.ICML 2025
- On Pre-training Language Model for AntibodyDanqing Wang, Fei Ye, Hao ZhouICLR 2023 · 12 citations
- Pre-training Antibody Language Models for Antigen-Specific Computational Antibody DesignKaiyuan Gao, Lijun Wu, Jinhua Zhu, Tianbo Peng et al.KDD 2023 · 12 citations
- Implicitly Guided Design with PropEn: Match your Data to Follow the GradientNatasa Tagasovska, Vladimir Gligorijevic, Kyunghyun Cho, Andreas LoukasNeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations
- GeoAB: Towards Realistic Antibody Design and Reliable Affinity MaturationHaitao Lin, Lirong Wu, Yufei Huang, Yunfan Liu et al.ICML 2024 · 11 citations
