DSGym: A Standardized and Holistic Framework for Evaluating and Training Data Science Agents
Fan Nie, Junlin Wang, Harper Hua, Federico Bianchi, Yongchan Kwon, Zhenting Qi, Owen Queen, Shang Zhu, James Zou
Abstract
Data science agents promise to accelerate discovery and insight-generation by turning data into executable analyses and findings. Yet existing data science benchmarks fall short due to fragmented evaluation interfaces that make cross-benchmark comparison difficult, narrow task coverage and a lack of rigorous data grounding. In particular, we show that a substantial portion of tasks in current benchmarks can be solved without using the actual data. To address these limitations, we introduce DSGym, a standardized framework for evaluating and training data science agents in self-contained execution environments. Unlike static benchmarks, DSGym provides a modular architecture that makes it easy to add tasks, agent scaffolds, and tools, positioning it as a live, extensible testbed. We curate DSGym-Tasks, a holistic task suite that standardizes and refines existing benchmarks via quality and shortcut solvability filtering. We further expand coverage with (1) DSBio: expert-derived bioinformatics tasks grounded in literature and (2) DSPredict: challenging prediction tasks spanning domains such as computer vision, molecular prediction, and single-cell perturbation. Beyond evaluation, DSGym enables agent training via execution-verified data synthesis pipeline. As a case study, we build a 2,000-example training set and trained a 4B model in DSGym that outperforms GPT-4o on standardized analysis benchmarks. Overall, DSGym enables rigorous end-to-end measurement of whether agents can plan, implement, and validate data Figure 1: (a) In the typical scientific discovery process, DSGym specifically focuses on the Data-Driven Investigation phase, where agents must bridge scientific hypotheses and empirical evidence through complex analysis. (b) We provide a unified environment spanning 10+ scientific domains and diverse file types. The framework enables a closed-loop ecosystem for both evaluation and training.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 47efa09a-c614-46ca-adfd-f35002be74abCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code GenerationYuhang Lai, Chengxi Li, Yiming Wang, Tianyi Zhang et al.ICML 2023 · 504 citations
- Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM AgentsXingyao Wang, Yangyi Chen, Lifan Yuan, Yizhe Zhang et al.ICML 2024 · 436 citations
- MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning ExperimentationQian Huang, Jian Vora, Percy Liang, Jure LeskovecICML 2024 · 209 citations
- Scaling Generalist Data-Analytic AgentsShuofei Qiao, Yanqiu Zhao, Zhisong Qiu, Xiaobin Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 12 citations
- MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning EngineeringJun Shern Chan, Neil Chowdhury, Oliver Jaffe, James Aung et al.ICLR 2025 · 9 citations
Related papers
- DSBench: How Far Are Data Science Agents from Becoming Data Science Experts?Liqiang Jing, Zhehui Huang, Xiaoyang Wang, Wenlin Yao et al.ICLR 2025
- ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific DiscoveryZiru Chen, Shijie Chen, Yuting Ning, Qianheng Zhang et al.ICLR 2025 · 6 citations
- SciAgentGym: Benchmarking Multi-Step Scientific Tool-Use in LLM AgentsYujiong Shen, Yajie Yang, Zhiheng Xi, Binze Hu et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
- InnovatorBench: Evaluating Agents' Ability to Conduct Innovative AI ResearchYunze Wu, Dayuan Fu, Weiye Si, Zhen Huang et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
- DA-Code: Agent Data Science Code Generation Benchmark for Large Language ModelsYiming Huang, Jianwen Luo, Yan Yu, Yitong Zhang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 7 citations
