RepoReasoner: Evaluating Repository-Level Code Reasoning Ability of Long-Context Language Models
Yanlin Wang, Suiquan Wang, Yanli Wang, Bowen Zhang, Daya Guo, Jiachi Chen, Zibin Zheng
Abstract
Recent large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance on software engineering tasks, yet most existing benchmarks evaluate code reasoning at the function level, where all relevant information is localized. This setting fails to reflect real-world development, which requires reasoning across multiple files and complex dependency structures. We introduce RepoReasoner, a benchmark for evaluating repository-level code reasoning. It assesses two complementary abilities: Output Prediction, which measures fine-grained, stateful execution reasoning across files, and Call Chain Prediction, which evaluates high-level architectural dependency understanding under noisy context. Our benchmark is constructed through a multi-stage pipeline that leverages dynamic tracing of pytest executions to obtain ground-truth call chains, along with LLM-based I/O rewriting to reduce memorization effects. We evaluate seven state-of-the-art LLMs. Even under oracle context, the best-performing model achieves only 69.1% Pass@1 on Output Prediction, indicating that cross-file reasoning remains a major challenge. In Call Chain Prediction, models exhibit high precision but low recall, suggesting limited multi-hop dependency understanding. Furthermore, performance drops on rewritten data reveal partial reliance on memorization, and longer contexts do not consistently improve results due to noise. These findings highlight fundamental limitations in current LLMs' repository-level reasoning and motivate future work on structured architectural understanding and cross-file inference.
CCS Concepts: • Software and its engineering → Automatic programming.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on23
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- CRUXEval: A Benchmark for Code Reasoning, Understanding and ExecutionAlex Gu, Baptiste Rozière, Hugh James Leather, Armando Solar-Lezama et al.ICML 2024 · 270 citations
- Retrieval-based neural source code summarizationJian Zhang, Xu Wang, Hongyu Zhang, Hailong Sun et al.ICSE 2020 · 242 citations
- ReACC: A Retrieval-Augmented Code Completion FrameworkShuai Lu, Nan Duan, Hojae Han, Daya Guo et al.ACL 2022 · 208 citations
- RepoCoder: Repository-Level Code Completion Through Iterative Retrieval and GenerationFengji Zhang, Bei Chen, Yue Zhang, Jacky Keung et al.EMNLP 2023 · 110 citations
Related papers
- RepoBench: Benchmarking Repository-Level Code Auto-Completion SystemsTianyang Liu, Canwen Xu, Julian J. McAuleyICLR 2024 · 338 citations
- Can Language Models Replace Programmers for Coding? REPOCOD Says 'Not Yet'Shanchao Liang, Nan Jiang, Yiran Hu, Lin TanACL 2025 · 9 citations
- CodeSense: a Real-World Benchmark and Dataset for Code Semantic ReasoningMonoshi Kumar Roy, Simin Chen, Benjamin Steenhoek, Jinjun Peng et al.ICLR 2026 · 18 citations
- Reasoning Runtime Behavior of a Program with LLM: How Far are We?Junkai Chen, Zhiyuan Pan, Xing Hu, Zhenhao Li et al.ICSE 2025 · 5 citations
- From Laboratory to Real-World Applications: Benchmarking Agentic Code Reasoning at the Repository LevelJia Li, Yuxin Su, Michael R. LyuACL 2026 · 4 citations
