S2RL: Do We Really Need to Perceive All States in Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning?
Shuang Luo, Yinchuan Li, Jiahui Li, Kun Kuang, Furui Liu, Yunfeng Shao, Chao Wu
Abstract
Collaborative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has been widely used in many practical applications, where each agent makes a decision based on its own observation. Most mainstream methods treat each local observation as an entirety when modeling the decentralized local utility functions. However, they ignore the fact that local observation information can be further divided into several entities, and only part of the entities is helpful to model inference. Moreover, the importance of different entities may change over time. To improve the performance of decentralized policies, the attention mechanism is used to capture features of local information. Nevertheless, existing attention models rely on dense fully connected graphs and cannot better perceive important states. To this end, we propose a sparse state based MARL (S2RL) framework, which utilizes a sparse attention mechanism to discard irrelevant information in local observations. The local utility functions are estimated through the self-attention and sparse attention mechanisms separately, then are combined into a standard joint value function and auxiliary joint value function in the central critic. We design the S2RL framework as a plug-and-play module, making it general enough to be applied to various methods. Extensive experiments on StarCraft II show that S2RL can significantly improve the performance of many state-of-the-art methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4799cd87-77c6-40a5-b263-21f96162d99bCited by top-tier papers2
- Universal Domain Adaptation via Compressive Attention MatchingDidi Zhu, Yinchuan Li, Junkun Yuan, Zexi Li et al.ICCV 2023 · 26 citations
- Cooperative Policy Agreement: Learning Diverse Policy for Offline MARLYihe Zhou, Yuxuan Zheng, Yue Hu, Kaixuan Chen et al.AAAI 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on12
- Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningTabish Rashid, Gregory Farquhar, Bei Peng, Shimon WhitesonNeurIPS 2020 · 1,960 citations
- QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-LearningJianhao Wang, Zhizhou Ren, Terry Liu, Yang Yu et al.ICLR 2021 · 595 citations
- Multi-Agent Game Abstraction via Graph Attention Neural NetworkYong Liu, Weixun Wang, Yujing Hu, Jianye Hao et al.AAAI 2020 · 316 citations
- ROMA: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Emergent RolesTonghan Wang, Heng Dong, Victor R. Lesser, Chongjie ZhangICML 2020 · 286 citations
- Multi-Agent Actor-Critic with Hierarchical Graph Attention NetworkHeechang Ryu, Hayong Shin, Jinkyoo ParkAAAI 2020 · 143 citations
Related papers
- MASER: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Subgoals Generated from Experience Replay BufferJeewon Jeon, Woojun Kim, Whiyoung Jung, Youngchul SungICML 2022 · 53 citations
- Complementary Attention for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningJianzhun Shao, Hongchang Zhang, Yun Qu, Chang Liu et al.ICML 2023 · 17 citations
- Learning from Good Trajectories in Offline Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningQi Tian, Kun Kuang, Furui Liu, Baoxiang WangAAAI 2023 · 14 citations
- Shapley Counterfactual Credits for Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningJiahui Li, Kun Kuang, Baoxiang Wang, Furui Liu et al.KDD 2021 · 49 citations
- Agent-Centric Actor-Critic for Asynchronous Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningWhiyoung Jung, Sunghoon Hong, Deunsol Yoon, Kanghoon Lee et al.ICML 2025
