Lune

ICML2025Top-tier venue

Mitigating Local Cohesion and Global Sparseness in Graph Contrastive Learning with Fuzzy Boundaries

Yuena Lin, Haichun Cai, Jun-Yi Hang, Haobo Wang, Zhen Yang, Gengyu Lyu

Abstract

Graph contrastive learning (GCL) aims at narrowing positives while dispersing negatives, often causing a minority of samples with great similarities to gather as a small group. It results in two latent shortcomings in GCL: 1) local cohesion that a class cluster contains numerous independent small groups, and 2) global sparseness that these small groups (or isolated samples) dispersedly distribute among all clusters. These shortcomings make the learned distribution only focus on local similarities among partial samples, which hinders the ability to capture the ideal global structural properties among real clusters, especially high intra-cluster compactness and intercluster separateness. Considering this, we design a novel fuzzy boundary by extending the original cluster boundary with fuzzy set theory, which involves fuzzy boundary construction and fuzzy boundary contraction to address these shortcomings. The fuzzy boundary construction dilates the original boundaries to bridge the local groups, and the fuzzy boundary contraction forces the dispersed samples or groups within the fuzzy boundary to gather tightly, jointly mitigating local cohesion and global sparseness while forming the ideal global structural distribution (Zhang et al., 2024) . Extensive experiments demonstrate that a graph auto-encoder with the fuzzy boundary significantly outperforms current state-of-the-art GCL models in both downstream tasks and quantitative analysis.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 1 top-tier paper that cites it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers1

  1. CaliGCL: Calibrated Graph Contrastive Learning via Partitioned Similarity and Consistency DiscriminationYuena Lin, Hao Wei, Hai-Chun Cai, Bohang Sun et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations

Builds on17

  1. Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
  2. Graph Representation Learning via Graphical Mutual Information MaximizationZhen Peng, Wenbing Huang, Minnan Luo, Qinghua Zheng et al.WWW 2020 · 682 citations
  3. Graph Contrastive Learning AutomatedYuning You, Tianlong Chen, Yang Shen, Zhangyang WangICML 2021 · 604 citations
  4. GraphMAE: Self-Supervised Masked Graph AutoencodersZhenyu Hou, Xiao Liu, Yukuo Cen, Yuxiao Dong et al.KDD 2022 · 533 citations
  5. Multi-level Feature Learning for Contrastive Multi-view ClusteringJie Xu, Huayi Tang, Yazhou Ren, Liang Peng et al.CVPR 2022 · 335 citations

Related papers

  1. FNSCC: Fuzzy Neighborhood-Aware Self-Supervised Contrastive Clustering for Short TextZijian Zheng, Yonghe Lu, Jian YinEMNLP Findings 2025
  2. Graph Contrastive ClusteringHuasong Zhong, Jianlong Wu, Chong Chen, Jianqiang Huang et al.ICCV 2021 · 163 citations
  3. Enhancing Contrastive Learning on Graphs with Node SimilarityHongliang Chi, Yao MaKDD 2024 · 1 citation
  4. Contrastive Learning Meets Homophily: Two Birds with One StoneDongxiao He, Jitao Zhao, Rui Guo, Zhiyong Feng et al.ICML 2023 · 14 citations
  5. Generative and Contrastive Paradigms Are Complementary for Graph Self-Supervised LearningYuxiang Wang, Xiao Yan, Chuang Hu, Quanqing Xu et al.ICDE 2024 · 11 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines