CPMöbius: Iterative Coach–Player Reasoning for Data-Free Reinforcement Learning
Ran Li, Zeyuan Liu, Yinghao Chen, Bingxiang He, Jiarui Yuan, Zixuan Fu, Weize Chen, Jinyi Hu, Chen Qian, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong potential in complex reasoning, yet their progress remains fundamentally constrained by reliance on massive high-quality human-curated tasks and labels, either through supervised fine-tuning (SFT) or reinforcement learning (RL) on reasoning-specific data. This dependence renders supervision-heavy training paradigms increasingly unsustainable, with signs of diminishing scalability already evident in practice. To overcome this limitation, we introduce CPMöbius, a collaborative Coach-Player paradigm for data-free reinforcement learning of reasoning models. Unlike traditional adversarial self-play frameworks, CPMöbius inspired by multi-agent collaboration, treats the Coach and Player as independent but cooperative roles. The Coach proposes instructions targeted at the Player's capability and receives rewards based on changes in the Player's performance, while the Player is rewarded for solving the increasingly instructive tasks generated by the Coach. This cooperative optimization loop is designed to directly enhance the Player's mathematical reasoning ability. Remarkably, CPMöbius achieves substantial improvement without relying on any external training data, outperforming existing unsupervised approaches. For example, on Qwen2.5-Math-7B-Instruct, our method improves accuracy by overall average +4.9 and out-of-distribution average +5.4, which exceed RENT by +1.5 on overall accuracy and R-zero by +4.2 on OOD accuracy. Our codebase has been released at https: //github.com/thunlp/CPMobius .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 477d2273-7e9e-4b6d-a11f-9bc8e1188b46Builds on14
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- Self-Rewarding Language ModelsWeizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li et al.ICML 2024 · 569 citations
Related papers
- Right Question is Already Half the Answer: Fully Unsupervised LLM Reasoning IncentivizationQingyang Zhang, Haitao Wu, Changqing Zhang, Peilin Zhao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 134 citations
- Native Reasoning Models: Training Language Models to Reason on Unverifiable DataYuanfu Wang, Zhixuan Liu, Li xiangtian, Chaochao Lu et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- First SFT, Second RL, Third UPT: Continual Improving Multi-Modal LLM Reasoning via Unsupervised Post-TrainingLai Wei, Yuting Li, Chen Wang, Yue Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 28 citations
- Satori: Reinforcement Learning with Chain-of-Action-Thought Enhances LLM Reasoning via Autoregressive SearchMaohao Shen, Guangtao Zeng, Zhenting Qi, Zhang-Wei Hong et al.ICML 2025
- Escaping the Verifier: Learning to Reason via DemonstrationsLocke Cai, Max Ryabinin, Ivan ProvilkovICML 2026 · 6 citations
